查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- The Logic of Mohist Reasonings; Leis and Structured Sorts
- 電信網路管理之SDH Q3 Agent探討
- Fortran 90實現物件導向繼承功能之探討
- "Miao Rebellion" and Discursive Construction of Ethnic Identity
- 無參數試題反應理論的能力群組之模糊分割
- Classification of Multi-Spectral Image Data Considering Non-Gaussian Distribution and Inter-Pixel Class Dependency
- A Study of Noun-Class Markers in Kavalan
- 臺灣下肢障礙中年人在不同障礙負荷下影響體型變化之研究
- A View Mechanism for Simulating Schema Evolution in an Object-Oriented Database
- 二橫斷面資料之分析比較--社區性高血壓研究
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | The Logic of Mohist Reasonings; Leis and Structured Sorts=墨子論理之邏輯;類與結構化種類 |
---|---|
作 者 | Lucas, Thierry; | 書刊名 | 哲學與文化 |
卷 期 | 37:8=435 2010.08[民99.08] |
頁 次 | 頁65-93 |
專 輯 | 中西邏輯比較研究專題 |
分類號 | 121.41 |
關鍵詞 | 墨子邏輯; 悖論; 西方邏輯; 類; 類別; 結構化種類; Mohist logic; Paradoxes; Western logic; Lei; Classes; Structured sorts; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 眾所周知,墨子在〈小取〉篇最後部分的某些論理是一種悖論:「則雖盜人人也……殺盜人非殺人也。」在本文中,筆者要用當代西方邏輯分類的概念-類別、種類、結構化種類-來分析及闡述墨子幾組不同的論理。我們用種類解決了這些悖論,並且更普遍地達到下面這個結論:那些論理是以結構化種類為基礎,我們認為這個概念是釐清類之概念的基礎。 |
英文摘要 | It is well-known that some Mohist reasonings of the final portion of the Xiao qu 〈小取〉 are paradoxical: ”a robber is a man, but to kill a robber is not to kill a man”. In this paper, we analyze and formalize the different groups of Mohist reasonings using concepts of contemporary western logic: classes, sorts, structured sorts as they appear in the mathematical theory of categories. We solve those paradoxes by using sorts and more generally arrive at the conclusion that those reasonings are based on structured sorts, a notion which, in our opinion, is fundamental to clarify the notion of lei (類). |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。