頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 英語版可接受噪音值對聽損者助聽器使用形態之預測及其與助聽器滿意度關係之探討=Investigating the Predictability of English Acceptable Noise Level towards the Usage Pattern of Chinese Hearing Aid User and Exploring the Relationship between ANL and Satisfaction of Hearing Aids |
---|---|
作者 | 吳若琪; 黃啟原; 楊義良; | 書刊名 | 臺灣聽力語言學會雜誌 |
卷期 | 25 2010.06[民99.06] |
頁次 | 頁23-51 |
分類號 | 416.865 |
關鍵詞 | 最舒適音量; 背景噪音上限; 可接受噪音值; 助聽器滿意度; Most comfortable level; MCL; Background noise level; BNL; Acceptable noise level; ANL; Hearing aid satisfaction; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 背景噪音是影響助聽器滿意度重要因素,而且在背景噪音下效果不佳是造成拒絕使用助聽器的主要原因之一。可接受噪音值(Acceptable Noise Level, ANL)概念於2004年被提出,其主張個人在背景噪音環境下聆聽的意願可用來預測助聽器使用形態。本研究之目的在於驗證英語版可接受噪音值對華語聽力損失者的助聽器使用形態是否具有預測力,同時探討聽力損失者的可接受噪音值與助聽器滿意度的相關性。研究對象為33名過去五年內曾選配過助聽器之聽力損失者,以英語的可接受噪音值及背景噪音語料測量其裸耳及戴助聽器時的可接受噪音值,請受試者填寫助聽器滿意度量表,同時測量受試者的純音聽力閾值。結果顯示:性別、年齡、聽力損失程度以及自覺障礙程度不會影響可接受噪音值。可接受噪音值與對助聽器的滿意度呈負相關,可接受噪音值越小,助聽器滿意度量表分數越高。在助聽器使用形態方面,有20名受試者為經常使用、8名偶爾使用,5名受試者不使用;三群不同使用形態受試者的可接受噪音值呈現顯著差別;應用邏輯式迴歸分析,以裸耳可接受噪音值預測助聽器使用形態為成功,預測準確率73%。顯示英語可接受噪音值語料對以華語為母語聽力損失者助聽器的使用形態有一定程度的預測力。 |
英文摘要 | The aims of this study were to explore the relationship between acceptable noise level (ANL) and satisfaction of hearing aid, to investigate the predictability of English ANL towards the usage pattern of Chinese hearing aid user. Thirty three Chinese hearing aid users fitted in last five years were tested with English acceptable noise level distributed by Cosmos Company. They were requested to fill out the Hearing Aid Satisfaction Questionnaire and their hearing thresholds of both ears were also collected. Results demonstrated that the ANL may not be correlated to age, gender, degree of hearing loss as well as self-perceived hearing handicap level. ANL is related to the satisfaction of hearing aid, the smaller the unaided ANL, the higher the self-assessed hearing aid satisfaction scores. ANLs were significantly different among the regular users, part-time users and non-users of hearing aids. English ANL can predict the different usage pattern of Chinese hearing aid user; its accuracy of prediction was 73%. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。