查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 憲法之「科際整合」研究的意義與可能性--一個方法論的反思=A Methodological Reflection on the Interdisciplinary Studies in Constitutional Law |
---|---|
作 者 | 張嘉尹; | 書刊名 | 世新法學 |
卷 期 | 3:2 2010.06[民99.06] |
頁 次 | 頁1-49 |
分類號 | 581.21 |
關鍵詞 | 憲法; 法釋義學; 憲法理論; 科際整合研究; 方法論; Constitutional law; Legal dogmatics; Constitutional theory; Lnterdisciplinary studies; Methodology; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文首先釐清憲法學性質。如果憲法學的核心意義是憲法釋義學,有必要更詳細界定在何種意義上憲法學即是憲法釋義學,以及提出更充份的論證來說明,何以憲法學是憲法釋義學的主張是適當的。憲法之「科際整合」研究所涉及的是,如何將其他科學的研究成果納入憲法釋義學,或為憲法釋義學所用。就此而言,本文從法律知識建構的角度指出,經驗性論證以及一般實踐論證,是其他科學知識進入憲法學的可能位置,亦即真正發生「科際整合」的所在。除了「整合性」的科際合作之外,本文指出,還存在著另一種可能性,亦即非整合性的科際合作,藉助其他科學的研究成果來反省與批判憲法學所預設的各種事實前提,這種作用或許才真正是提倡“interdisciplinary studies in law“ 的用意所在,因為開啟了從整體脈絡來理解與研究法律之門,以阻止法學沉溺於與外界隔絕的規範性之中。本文最後藉由指出憲法理論同時具有的規範性與事實關聯性,同時具有與憲法釋義學以及其他科學的關聯性,嘗試闡明憲法理論作為「科際整合」中介的意義與可能性。 |
英文摘要 | An interdisciplinary study in constitutional law means the study of constitutional law by means of another scientific approach rather than the traditional legal analysis. A critical point is the relationship between legal science and the interdisciplinary studies. In order to ascertain the relationship between these different kinds of knowledge, it is necessary to investigate the nature of legal knowledge. It is to assert that the true nature of legal science is doctrinal (dogmatic). However, it is necessary to specify that legal science is legal dogmatics and to justify why it is legal dogmatics. There are at least two relationships between these sciences. One is to integrate the outcomes of interdisciplinary studies into legal dogmatics. The other means the integration of doctrinal knowledge of law into, for example, social sciences. In order to find an entrance for social science into legal dogmatics, the construction of doctrinal knowledge must be decomposed. This can be achieved through the analysis of the forms of legal argumentation. Since the teleological argument, especially in the form of consequential argument, *Associate Professor, School of Law, Shih-Hsin University involves both normative and cognitive (empirical) elements, it is an appropriate place for the “integration”. There is also a third possible relationship between legal dogmatics and interdisciplinary studies: a non-integrative, critical one. Since legal dogmatics often makes use of common sense by interpreting the law, the insights offered by empirical sciences that are critical can be used to deconstruct legal science. Interdisciplinary studies can be contributive to challenge background assumptions of legal science that are often decisive in legal decision making. It is finally to argue that the constitutional theory could play an important role in the interdisciplinary studies because of its two-dimension character. For the constitutional theory is not only its relationship to the legal dogmatics, but also that to the empirical studies constitutive. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。