查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 海峽兩岸有關毒奶事件的法律觀照=Law Reviews on Chinese Milk Scandal--To Taiwan and China |
---|---|
作者 | 張麗卿; Chang, Li-ching; |
期刊 | 東海大學法學研究 |
出版日期 | 20091200 |
卷期 | 31 2009.12[民98.12] |
頁次 | 頁105-149 |
分類號 | 412.25 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 毒奶事件; 三聚氫胺; 食品衛生; 想像競合; 加重結果犯; Chinese milk scandal; Melamine; Food safety; Notional concurrence; Increased effect offender; |
中文摘要 | 2008年,大陸發生三鹿集團製銷毒奶粉的事件,本事件除造成當地多數民眾的死傷外,台灣也因在食品的製作上使用三鹿奶粉作為原料而遭受牽連。本事件堪稱是近年「黑心食品」的典型代表,也突顯食品衛生安全問題的重要性。雖然大陸法院對於毒奶案的被告們已為判決,但是食品衛生安全法益,如何藉由國家刑罰權的介入而能夠獲得實質的保障,這個問題仍有待解決。大陸對於食品安全保護的刑事規範,主要是大陸刑法第140條生產銷售偽劣產品罪與第144條生產銷售有毒有害食品罪,另有可能成立第115條以危險方法危害公共安全罪。至於台灣對於食品安全的刑事立法,除刑法第191與191之1條外,另有食品衛生管理法第34條。就兩岸食品衛生安全的立法相較,大陸無論是規範的結構或法律之效果,皆較台灣縝密且嚴厲,但是易產生刑法構成要件明確性不足以及法律效果過於嚴厲的問題;反之,台灣對於食品衛生安全的刑事立法相對寬鬆,若毒奶事件發生在台灣,可能產生無法有效保障人民身體健康法益的立法缺漏。透過毒奶事件,恰可全面檢討我國食品衛生安全的刑事立法,及未來在刑法修正時提供具體建議。 |
英文摘要 | The Chinese milk scandal broke in 2008 that was a food safety incident in the People's Republic of China involving milk and infant formula adulterated with melamine. The incident not only had many victims, including infants dying and babies hospitalized but also found that the melamine in the tainted milk were used in Taiwan after widespread. This scandal was a typical toxic food event that damaged the reputation of China and raised concerns about food safety. China court have sentenced the defendants in response to the incident. On the concern of regulating food safety, how to insure the legal interests of persons and successful operation of the State's power to obtain substantive protection shall be given.In China, three articles are established in Criminal Code to regulate food safety: Article 140-selling false product, Article 144-making-selling adulterated food and Article 115-in dangerous way to offense against public security. While in Taiwan, food safety is regulated under Article 191 and Article 191-1 of criminal code as well as Article 34 of food safety and management Act.Comparing with food safety legislations between Taiwan and China, the structure of norms and effect of law in China would be obviously denseness and strict than Taiwan. However, that it may raise the issues of concerning unclear criminal elements and too much strict effect of law. In contrast to regulating food safety and sanitation in Taiwan, loose criminal regulations would be a leak of protecting right of human health if the similar adulteration incident happened. Overwhelmingly, Chinese milk scandal can help us to review criminal regulations for food safety and sanitation in Taiwan and make specific recommendations to Criminal Law Revision Committee in the future. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。