頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 土壤污染整治規範對土壤污染整治技術發展之影響--以日本「土壤污染對策法」之實施經驗為例=The Effect of Soil Contamination Remediation Regulations on the Development of Remediation Techniques, as Exemplified by the Implementation of the Soil Contamination Countermeasures Law in Japan |
---|---|
作 者 | 蔡玉娟; | 書刊名 | 經社法制論叢 |
卷 期 | 45 2010.01[民99.01] |
頁 次 | 頁137-167 |
分類號 | 445.9 |
關鍵詞 | 土壤污染; 日本; 土壤污染對策法; 臺灣; 土壤及地下水污染整治法; Soil contanmination; Japan; Soil Contanmination Countermeasures Law; Taiwan; Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Act; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 日本為改善土壤污染問題,於西元2003 年實施「土壤污染對策法」。我國因應土壤污染問題,已早於日本3年,於西元2000年實施「土壤及地下水污染整治法」,由於制定「土壤及地下水污染整治法」之初,日本「土壤污染對策法」尚未實施,無法成為我國之立法例,亦相對減少日本「土壤污染對策法」被介紹之機會。日本「土壤污染對策法」與我國「土壤及地下水污染整治法」最大的不同之處在於,日本採取較為嚴格之包含無過失土地所有人等在內之土壤污染整治責任人之規定。本文以日本各界對「土壤污染對策法」探討之相關文章以及日本「土壤污染對策法」最新修正條文內容為題材,介紹日本「土壤污染對策法」在制定實施後,日本各界對土壤污染整治技術需求帶動土壤污染整治技術發展之經驗。在文末並探討日本採取較嚴格之土壤污染整治責任人規定之因素,以及日本「土壤污染對策法」中其他與台灣「土壤及地下水污染整治法」規定相異之處。 |
英文摘要 | Japan's Soil Contamination Countermeasures Law came into effect in 2003, three years after Taiwan enacted its Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Act. Since Taiwan's legislation in this area preceded Japan's, its drafters could not refer to the Japanese model, which consequently has not been closely studied in Taiwan. There are substantial differences between Japan's Soil Contamination Countermeasures Law and Taiwan's Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Act, particularly in respect of responsibility for undertaking remediation, which Japan imposes on innocent landowners but Taiwan does not. This study peruses the literature on Japan's Soil Contamination Countermeasures Law, to examine the enforcement of the law and its effect on remediation techniques. It also looks into the reasons for Japan's adoption of the stricter imposition of responsibility on innocent owners, and identifies other points of difference between the law in Japan and the law in Taiwan. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。