頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Examination of the Psychometric Properties of the Conners' Parent and Teacher Rating Scale-revised Short Form Using Multidimensional Rasch Modeling=以多向度羅序模式檢驗柯能氏家長版及老師版兒童行為量表--修訂版之心理計量 |
---|---|
作 者 | 蘇佳廷; 王文中; 高淑芬; 宋維村; 許清芳; 丘彥南; 蔡文哲; 謝清麟; | 書刊名 | Taiwanese Journal of Psychiatry |
卷 期 | 23:2 2009.06[民98.06] |
頁 次 | 頁146-158 |
分類號 | 415.989 |
關鍵詞 | 注意力缺失/過動症; 柯能氏問卷; 多向度羅序模式分析; ADHD; Conners' rating scale; Multidimensional Rasch analysis; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 目的:柯能氏問卷已被廣泛使用於注意力缺失/過動症 (ADHD) 孩童的篩選及療效量測。然而,問卷的心理計量卻未被完整的檢驗。故本研究的目的為藉由多向度羅序模式,分析柯能氏家長版及老師版兒童行為量表- 修訂版(CPRS-R:S 及CTRS-R:S)中各子測驗的向度一致性,轉換序位尺度成等距尺度,及檢驗分數層級的合適性。 方法:研究對象包含具代表性的學校樣本2584 名學生(含國小1 年級至國中3 年級),及555 位5 歲至16 歲從北臺灣醫學中心招募的臨床個案(含ADHD 及非ADHD 診斷)。個案的家長及老師分別填寫中文版的CPRS-R:S 及CTRS-R:S。我們使用多向度羅序模式分析以檢驗兩份問卷之心理計量。 結果:移除5 題配適度差的題目後,其餘題目的模式與資料配適度佳。這支持了8 個子測驗個別的向度一致性及等距尺度的達成。另外,8 個子測驗亦有相當合適的分數層級。 結論:去除掉5題配適度差的題目,CPRS-R:S 及CTRS-R:S 皆為有效且可靠之ADHD 症狀的評估工具。此外,轉換原始分數為等距尺度改善了在比較評估結果方面的精準度。 |
英文摘要 | Objective : The Conners’ Rating Scales (CRS) have been widely used for screening and measuring outcomes in treating children with attention-defi cit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, the psychometric properties of the CRS have not been fully examined. This study aimed to validate the dimensionality, to transform ordinal scores into interval scores, and to examine the appropriateness of the scoring levels of the Conners’ Parent and Teacher Rating Scale-Revised Short Form (CPRS-R:S and CTRS-R:S, respectively) by using multidimensional Rasch analysis. Methods : The sample included a representative school-based sample of 2,584 grades 1 to 9 students and a clinic-based group of 555 participants aged 5 to 16 with and without ADHD consecutively recruited from a medical center in northern Taiwan. Their parents and teachers completed the Chinese versions of the CPRS-R:S and CTRS-R:S, respectively. We used multidimensional Rasch analysis to examine the psychometric properties of both scales. Results : After removing 5 poor-fi tting items, all the remaining items showed satisfactory modeldata fi t, which, subsequently, supported the unidimensionality of each of the 8 subtests and achieved interval-level measurement. Also, the scoring levels of the 8 subtests in the CPRS-R:S and CTRS-R:S were fairly appropriate. Conclusion : The CPRS-R:S and CTRS-R:S with the 5 misfit items removed are both valid and reliable tools in assessing symptoms of ADHD. Moreover, the transformation of raw scores into interval scores improves the precision of comparison between assessments. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。