查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- ICSID框架下臺商赴中國大陸跨國投資爭端解決之探討
- 國際投資保障條約下投資人對地主國仲裁費用問題
- 跨太平洋夥伴協定下的投資人對地主國仲裁機制--以ICSID與UNCITRAL仲裁程序之比較為中心
- 投資人對地主國仲裁程序的透明化問題--兼論跨太平洋夥伴協定下投資保障專章的相關規範
- 中國國際經濟貿易仲裁委員會二000年仲裁規則修訂條文評析
- 國際投資爭端解決中心(ICSID)金字塔臺地仲裁判斷之評析
- 中華民國仲裁協會仲裁規則與中國國際經濟貿易仲裁委員會仲裁規則之比較
- 中國國際經濟貿易仲裁委員會於二○一二年之變動所產生的實務影響
- 國際投資爭端解決中心Compania de Aguas del Aconquija S.A. & Vivendi Universal (ex Compagnie Generale des Eaux) v. Argentine Republic一案之評析
- 投資人對地主國仲裁的前置程序之探討--以等待期間條款為中心
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | ICSID框架下臺商赴中國大陸跨國投資爭端解決之探討=A Study of International Investment Dispute Settlement Mechanism and Its Application on Taiwanese Investors in Mainland China |
---|---|
作者 | 林俊宏; Lin, Chun Hung; |
期刊 | 高大法學論叢 |
出版日期 | 20090900 |
卷期 | 5 2009.09[民98.09] |
頁次 | 頁179-217 |
分類號 | 586.8 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 國外直接投資; 國際投資爭端解決中心; 解決國家與他國國民間投資爭端公約; 中國國際經濟貿易仲裁委員會; 仲裁; Foreign direct investment; FDI; International centre for settlement of investment disputes; ICSID; Convention on the settlement of investment disputes between states and nationals of other states; China international economic and trade arbitration commission; CIETAC; Arbitration reform package; |
中文摘要 | 國外直接投資近年來在經濟全球化的腳步下快速成長,構築成國際經貿體系中非常重要的一環,而FDI對資本輸出國或流入國的經濟活動亦扮演極重要角色,而各國為吸引外資以配合國家建設之發展,皆有不同的政策及法規範調整模式,惟跨國投資雖帶來高收益,但亦伴隨著高風險,而在面臨高風險時,外國投資人即須注意跨國投資爭端發生後可能的解決途徑,尤其現今國際投資爭端解決機制之形成及發展更有其重要性,即國際間必須維持一個有效的法秩序,以保障國際商業交易的繼續成長,故探討相關跨國投資爭端解決之機構有其意義。另一方面,中國大陸先前為吸引國外資金、促進國內經濟發展為目標,而提供多項投資優惠,但當中國大陸現今經濟發展至一定規模之後,即須調整產業結構及配合國家發展方向,適度修改法令,而為國家發展而作出之政策轉變原無可厚非,但若法規範更動頻繁,導致跨境投資之鉅額損失,外國投資人可否訴請被投資國予以補償?面對投資爭端,台商在大陸是否可獲得與他國投資者相同公平、有效之投資爭端解決待遇?或在中國大陸投資之台資企業是否可運用現行國際投資爭端機制加以解決?尤其當臺灣目前於國際社會之處境仍為尷尬之際,台資企業遇到投資糾紛時,如何自保?有何求助管道?是台資企業赴中國大陸投資時不可不加以考量的風險因素,故本文即欲針對國際投資爭端解決機制與台商赴中國大陸投資爭端解決模式加以整理與探討。 |
英文摘要 | Under the trend of economic globalization, foreign direct investment has increased with high-speed, and become one part of international trade system. Because it's important role in economic activities, many countries have designed their own investment regulations and policies to fit the goals for national development. Although foreign direct investment has brought high-return, it also follows with high risk. Under such a high risk, foreign investors have to consider and find out the best resolutions for international investment disputes if it happens. Thus it is important and meaningful to debate the mechanism and legal orders for international investment disputes in order to protect free flow of international trade and business transactions. On the other hand, Mainland China had provided numbers of investment incentives to attract foreign capital and promote domestic economic development. However, following with the high economic growth rates, Mainland China had called off several special benefits for foreign investors, and made several legal adjustments to upgrade its industrial structures. Those changes may cause foreign investors huge loss so that they have to seek for the best way for investment disputes resolution. Taiwanese investors, as one of the biggest foreign investors, face different challenges and situation than other countries due to its special status in the international community. Therefore, this article aims to discuss the possible models for Taiwanese investors to handle investment disputes occurred in Mainland China. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。