查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 涉外著作權之國際私法問題探討
- 我國加入WTO在智慧財產權所作之法制調整與其評析--以著作權為中心
- A Study on the Software Patent Extraterritorial Infringement Provision--Centered on the U.S. Supreme Court Case of Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp.
- Protecting Intellectual Property Rights in China in the Context of the Past, the Present and the Future
- 我國加入世界貿易組織後關於著作權法適用之淺述
- 我國加入世界貿易組織後關於著作權擴大保護之說明與因應
- 論我國加入世界貿易組織前外國人著作之保護
- 談臺灣加入世界貿易組織後著作權的回溯既往問題
- 與貿易有關之智慧財產權協定與生物多樣性公約之衝突與調和:以生物遺傳資源之取得與利益分享為探討中心
- 兩岸智慧財產權之建立、發展與交流
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 涉外著作權之國際私法問題探討=A Study of the Conflict of Laws in International Copyright |
---|---|
作 者 | 林益山; | 書刊名 | 軍法專刊 |
卷 期 | 56:2 2010.04[民99.04] |
頁 次 | 頁4-22 |
分類號 | 588.34 |
關鍵詞 | 著作權; 國際私法; 貿易有關之智慧財產權協定; 世界貿易組織; 波恩公約; Copyright; Conflict of law; TRIPS; WTO; Berne Convention; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 著作權屬人類智能創作之權益,為典型之無體財產權;具有抽象性、公共 性、國際性及人格權之特質。而在交通便利、資訊發達,國際貿易興盛的今 天,著作權深具國際性,其法律關係亦常含有涉外因素而衍生甚多國際私法問 題有待解決與探討。 往日,著作權之保護偏向於文化層面,而今日則常以經濟利益作為考量之 基礎,此因對知識和技術之控制與一國之競爭力及經濟之發展息息相關。故智 慧財產權之國際保護,亦由最初之協調方式轉變成為強制性,例如TRIPS 協 定及WTO 組織,均具有強制執行力。 我國身為國際社會之一份子,理當積極參與國際事務,對智慧財產權之保 護亦應遵守國際規範,以盡國際社會一份子之責任。故法院於處理涉外著作權 之糾紛時,應依照國際私法之原理原則為之,以確定國際管轄權進而找出最適 當之法律作為準據法。千萬不可以處理國內案件之方式,逕依本國法律審判 之;否則所為之判決恐不被外國承認與執行,而成為具文。 |
英文摘要 | Copyright law is an area of private law which easily assumes this kind of international character because its subject matter effortlessly crosses geographical borders. This trait has been augmented by the development of the Internet and communication technologies. Scholars point out several important factors contributing to the ever-increasing importance of copyright law in the international arena. First, technological development allows a user easy worldwide access to copyrighted works to a degree unthinkable before. Second, the Internet threatens the traditional territorial principle of copyright law. Finally, copyright law has acquired outstanding importance as a result of the “shift of emphasis from manufactured goods to ideas, information, and images—the subject matter of intellectual property. These factors exacerbate old legal problems and even create new ones in international copyright disputes. One cluster of traditional problems that has gained new importance is that of conflict of laws questions surrounding both initial copyright ownership and transfer of rights. Problems regarding ownership and transfer of rights have been compounded by the growing transparency of national borders, the shift from industrial to information markets and burgeoning participation of copyrighted works in international commerce. These changes have, in turn, put unbearable pressure on the traditional interpretation of the principle of national treatment enshrined in the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works. According to the conventional understanding of national treatment, the law of a protecting country should determine all the issues of copyright, including ownership. This approach also comports with the related principle of territoriality because it regards copyright as consisting of separate sets of rights for each sovereign state. The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (Berne Convention)is one of the most influential copyright treaties in the world. First established in 1886, in Berne, Switzerland, this Convention sis now administered by the world Intellectual Property Organization(WIPO), an intergovernmental organization created under the auspices of the United Nations. International copyright law has long escaped the reach of the general conflict of laws analysis because it adhered to the conventional interpretation of the national treatment doctrine, according to which, “the courts in the state where in fringement occurs nearly always apply their own national law.” Copyright Law, thus, remained territorial and isolated from the parallel conflict of laws revolution that had taken place in tort and contract cases where the rigid territorial approach was displaced by various forms of “interest analysis.” |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。