查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Differentiating Personal Facilitators of Leisure Participation: Socio-demographics, Personality Traits, and the Need for Sociability
- 人格五因素模式與休閒態度、休閒參與的關聯性研究--以技術學院學生之戶外休閒參與為例
- 退休老人休閒活動參與及其幸福感之相關研究
- 國小高年級學童人格特質、休閒態度與休閒參與之研究--以臺東縣為例
- 人格特質、休閒參與與創造力關係之研究--以國小學童為例
- 人格特質與休閒參與活動之相關研究--以救護人員為例
- The Impact of Top Managers' Personality Traits on Corporate Culture: The Computer Industry as an Example
- 政治作戰學校正期班新生學校生活適應與人格特質之分析研究
- 公共服務與社會需求--略舉一九四0至七0年代博物館專業發展之相關議題
- 林口社區居民休閒參與型態之研究--核心模式之應用與驗證
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Differentiating Personal Facilitators of Leisure Participation: Socio-demographics, Personality Traits, and the Need for Sociability=休閒參與的個人背景差異:社會人口因素、人格特質、社會需求 |
---|---|
作者 | 傅仰止; 陸洛; 陳素燕; | 書刊名 | 觀光休閒學報 |
卷期 | 15:3 2009.12[民98.12] |
頁次 | 頁187-212 |
分類號 | 990.1 |
關鍵詞 | 休閒參與; 人格特質; 社會需求; Leisure participation; Personality traits; Sociability; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 休閒活動普遍與否,隨著眾多個人及社會因素而異,而同樣的背景因素對不同人口群體的作用又未必一致。本文分析基本特徵、人格特質、對社會性的需求這三大個人背景,各自對了解不同型態的休閒參與有何助益,三者的效應又有什麼異同。最後並以性別區分樣本後進一步分析,揭示背景因素在不同群體的差異功能。實證資料取自台灣社會變遷基本調查2007年的第五期第三次調查問卷二(n=2, 144)。文中藉由階層迴歸分析,發現獨處式休閒(例如聽音樂、看書)的參與程度,幾乎取決於個人的社會人口基本特徵,尤其是年齡和教育程度。而社會互動比較頻繁的休閒(包括和朋友聚會、從事體能活動),則因為人格特質和社會需求而有明顯的參與落差,不是個人基本特徵所能決定。如果個別衡量單一特徵的統計檢定結果是否顯著,大多可以清楚區辨什麼樣的個人背景有助於獨處式或社會式的休閒參與。但是細究這些背景的統計效應大小,進一步發現三大項個人背景在兩個類型的休閒參與中扮演相當不同的角色。此外,部分個人背景所產生的效應相當一致,其他背景的效應則因休閒類型而異,也隨著性別等基本的人群分類原則而有變化。 |
英文摘要 | This paper first compares the extent to which socio-demographics, personality traits, and the need for sociability each facilitates different kinds of leisure participation with the general population in Taiwan. It then distinguishes how some of these factors differ in facilitating leisure for men and women. By means of hierarchical regression analyses of data from the Taiwan Social Change Survey (n=2,144), we found that the participation in solitary leisure activities, including music listening and book reading, was overwhelmingly determined by socio-demographic factors, particularly age and education. In contrast, both personality traits and the need for sociability help explain who are engaged more often in mostly-social leisure such as gathering with friends and doing physical activities. Such intrapersonal and interpersonal forces also accounted for a larger proportion of the total explained variance. Although most measures of an individual's background were significant in differentiating who participated more in both solitary and mostly-social leisure, the activities differed markedly in the size effects of these measures. Furthermore, some of these personal measures facilitated leisure participation consistently, whereas others exerted somewhat contradictory or inconsistent effects, particularly within male and female subpopulations. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。