查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 《名公書判清明集.懲惡門.豪橫類》中的豪民=A Study of ‘Hao-min’ in Minggong Shupan Qingming Ji |
---|---|
作 者 | 黃慶中; | 書刊名 | 中正歷史學刊 |
卷 期 | 12 2009.12[民98.12] |
頁 次 | 頁113-138 |
分類號 | 546.1 |
關鍵詞 | 豪民; 官民關係; Hao-min; The relationship between officials and the public; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 透過對《清明集‧豪橫類》中所載各篇判詞作文本分析,本文認為:一、在判詞中,豪民與富民的涵義有別,豪民不單指富有的人。二、在判詞中,各個豪民在恐嚇或詐欺取財等不法行為上並沒有顯著差別。但豪民在發展社會關係時,常常與官方打交道,藉此取得某些特權,進而利用這些特權侵奪國家財政收入,這是值得注意的事情。三、在對豪民的文字描述上,名公們多以朝廷權威為出發,強調官與民之間應保持距離。透過比喻,將豪民描述成加害者,使受害者形象顯明,運用「警示」的語氣達到效果,塑造豪民「惡人」的形象。 |
英文摘要 | Through analyzing the judgments of the Qingming Ji, the paper comes to three main conclusions. Firstly, the meaning between ‘Hao-min’ (豪民) and ‘rich people’ is different. The two terms can not refer to each other. Secondly, there is no significant difference in illegal behaviors between each ‘Hao-min’. In the development of a society, however, in order to gain certain privileges ‘Hao-min’ used to bribe officials and then infringing upon the revenue of the government. It is a noteworthy point. Finally, most of the descriptions of the ‘Hao-min’ are based on the authority’s point of view which emphasized the distance between officials and the public. By using metaphors, ‘Hao-mins’ are described as perpetrators in order to highlight the image of their victims. More then that, a tone of ‘warning’ was also used in the judgments to build up negative images of ‘Hao-mins’. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。