查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 臺灣地區專利指標應用之書目計量學研究
- 大學圖書館專業期刊研究主題之比較研究:以《大學圖書館》與《College & Research Libraries》為例
- 臺灣與中國大陸圖書資訊學核心期刊論文之主題分析研究--以1997~2006年為例
- 臺灣公共行政研究的智能活動與主旨
- 大陸義務教育教材思想內涵之研究--以小學語文教科書為例
- 組織慣性特徵研究
- 不同來源之科學、科技議題屬性研究
- 臺灣網路花坊在WWW上廣告訊息呈現之探討
- Bibliometric Indicators of the Scholarly Productivity of Researchers and Scientists in Kuwait as Documented by Citations to Their Published Works
- 專利與專利資訊檢索
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 臺灣地區專利指標應用之書目計量學研究=Bibliometrics Analysis of Patent Indicators' Application in Taiwan |
---|---|
作者 | 梁峻齊; 阮明淑; Liang, Chun-chi; Yuan, Ming-shu; |
期刊 | 教育資料與圖書館學 |
出版日期 | 20090900 |
卷期 | 47:1 2009.秋[民98.秋] |
頁次 | 頁19-53 |
分類號 | 011.016 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 專利資訊; 專利指標; 書目計量學; 內容分析; Patent information; Patent indicators; Bibliometrics; Content analysis; |
中文摘要 | 十五年來專利指標研究文獻逐年成長,但是,至今尚無相關文獻對 專利指標進行系統性與全面性的了解。因此,本研究整理分析台灣 地區專利指標之研究與實證現況之文獻,期做為後續專利指標修訂、 研究與應用之參考。本研究利用專家常用關鍵字群進行檢索,再經 由文獻分析與內容分析方法,進行專利指標相關研究文獻之統計, 比較文獻歷年概況、學門與產業或企業類別之專利指標使用。本研 究結論為:(1)專利指標使用多元,且研究者常使用多個專利組合指 標;(2)台灣地區專利指標相關研究文獻量仍有成長空間;(3)台灣地 區進行專利指標相關主要研究團隊有七組;(4)學界使用專利指標與 財務績效連結並不明顯;(5)國立大學在政府研究資訊系統獲得較多 的計畫支持;(6)專利指標實證研究對象產業符合政府高科技政策規 劃;(7)以書目計量學的方法來分析專利資訊是目前較具可信度做法; 過去台灣地區專利指標使用大都屬於單一產業實證,本研究為台灣 地區首次針對專利指標相關文獻進行統計,可供後續興趣研究者ㄧ 窺專利指標研究發展的脈絡。 |
英文摘要 | The past 15 years (1995-2009) witnessed an annual growth of the literature on patent indicators. However, no research was done to examine the patent indicators systematically and comprehensively. This paper reviewed the literature and current application of patent indicators in Taiwan to provide references for the future revision, application, and studies. The researchers first searched the literature using the expert keywords group; then studied the key literature by content analysis, such as using statistics to compare the publications and the application of patent indicators in industries. The findings are as follows: (1) The ways that patent indicators have been used are various and researchers usually combine multiple indicators to use. (2) The study on patent indicators in Taiwan needs to be improved in terms of quantity. (3) There are seven major research teams dedicated to the study of patent indicators in Taiwan. (4) The relationship is not significant between the usage of patent indicators and the financial performance of industries. (5) Comparing with private universities, the state-owned universities obtained 73% of government support for the research of patent indicators. (6) The empirical studies on patent indicators in industries are relevant to the government high-tech policy planning. (7) Bibliometrics is a valid method to study patent information. This research is the first one to use statistics to analyze the literatures of patent indicators. Since it includes more than one industrial evidence, it provides valuable references for the future studies. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。