查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 運用鑽石模式建構高雄市都市競爭力評估指標=Constructs the Kaohsiung City Competitiveness Appraisal Indicators Using the Diamond Model |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 郭瑞坤; 謝政勳; 郭彰仁; 鄭伊峻; 洪培晟; | 書刊名 | 城市發展 |
卷期 | 7 2009.06[民98.06] |
頁次 | 頁74-97 |
分類號 | 575.1 |
關鍵詞 | 都市競爭優勢; 鑽石模型; 層級分析法; 高雄市; 指標; Urban competitive advantage; Diamond model; Analytic hierarchy process; Kaohsiung; Indicator; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 面對國際競爭趨勢,台灣曾提出「亞太營運中心」之跨世紀經 建計畫及發展台灣為「綠色矽島」的產業構想,甚至到「挑戰2008」國家發展重點計畫等,均是希望利用國家政策帶動地區發展,進而提昇台灣國際競爭力。而都市的發展更是如此,在全球化浪潮下,將來不再只是國內都市的互相競爭,而是與國外類似都市的競爭。 因此本研究嘗試應用Porter (1990) 所提出的國家競爭力鑽石模式來建構都市競爭優勢評估指標,以提供都市治理者參考之用。首要即為將細項指標予以層級化,針對各項構面與細項指標給予相對權重值。相對權重值的求取以問卷請專家學者進行成對比較,經運算與一致性檢定後得到。再利用簡單加權法將各評估指標予以標準化,最後再以加總方式計算高雄市自1997 年至2002 年間空間向度各年度的都市競爭力值,以求得高雄市都市競爭優勢的演變趨勢。 本研究所架構之都市競爭力指標,在評估構面部分的重要性,以「企業策略、結構與同業競爭」最為重要,「需求條件」居次。在時間向度的研究結果,高雄市在整體競爭優勢部分是呈現逐年成長的現象,以2001 年最具競爭力。但若個別要素來探討競爭力變化情形,發現高雄市在「企業策略、結構與同業競爭」向度競爭優勢呈現自1997 年起逐年下降的現象。另外,「需求條件」的競爭優勢則是呈現自2000 年後開始下降的現象。 |
英文摘要 | Facing the international competition tendency, Taiwan once proposed “Asia-Pacific Regional Operations Center” the cross-century economic construction plans and develops Taiwan is “the green silicon island” the industry to devise, even “challenges 2008” the national development key plan and so on, was the hope leads the local development using the national policy, then promotes the Taiwan international competitiveness. And the development of the city is even more like this, under the globalization tide, it will be no longer only competing each other of the domestic city in the future, but similar to foreign countries the competition of the city. So this research tries to use Porter (1990) National competitiveness diamond model to construct competitive advantage in the city assess indicator to build to come, provides using of the metropolis government reference. Primary for give detailed items of indicator level take, gives the relative weight value in view of each construction and detailed items of indicator. Asking for the experts and scholars to compare in pairs with the questionnaire to weight value, get after consistency examination. And then utilize the weighting method to each assess the indicator to standardize, calculate from 1997 to 2002 of Kaohsiung to the city competitiveness value of spending every year by way of adding totally afterwards, in order to try to get the development trend of the competition advantage in the city of Kaohsiung. The city competitiveness indicator of this research institute construction in appraisal construction partial importance, by “enterprise's tactics, structure and horizontal competition” are the most important, “demand conditions” occupies the time. In time to the findings, Kaohsiung in the whole competitive advantage part is the phenomenon which presents grows year by year, most had the competitiveness in 2001. But if the individual essential factor discusses the competitiveness change situation, discovered Kaohsiung city in “enterprise's tactics, structure and horizontal competition” presents the phenomenon to the competitive advantage which dropped year by year from 1997. Moreover, “demand conditions” the competitive advantage presents the phenomenon which started since 2000 to drop. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。