查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 藝術自主與民族大義:「紀弦為文化漢奸說」新探=Aesthetic Autonomy and National Morality: A New Researtch on "Ji-Xian as a Cultural-Hanjian" |
---|---|
作 者 | 劉正忠; | 書刊名 | 政大中文學報 |
卷 期 | 11 2009.06[民98.06] |
頁 次 | 頁163-197 |
分類號 | 863.51 |
關鍵詞 | 藝術自主; 民族大義; 文化漢奸; 淪陷區; 紀弦; Aesthetic autonomy; National morality; Cultural-Hanjian; The Japanese occupation; Ji Xian; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文在相對豐富的文獻基礎上,重新考察紀弦在淪陷區的行為與言談。一方面,試圖驗證所謂文化漢奸的指控是否可以成立,並探討其與詩人的創作有何關聯;另一方面,也想反過來觀察相關指控如何被操作,從而反思漢奸論述的深層意義。在論述過程中,我釐清了現有的指控不精準之處,並補充了若干關鍵材料。此外,又分別考察了紀弦在戰前、戰時、戰後的創作,掘發了一些內心底層的幽微訊息。最後,我提出的結論是,擺脫漢奸觀念的糾葛,則只有特定群體利益的明智計算,或者個體生命意識的深刻省察,而紀弦不能算是明智或深刻。 |
英文摘要 | This article is based on a relatively rich literature, re-explore Ji Xian’s behavior and writing during Japanese Occupation. On the one hand, I attempts to confirm whether the accuse of so-called cultural-hanjian can be established,and discusses what connection there is between the accuse and poetic creation. On the other hand, I also want to observe reversely how the related accuse to be operated, thus I reconsider the meaning of hanjian-discourse in depth. In an elaboration, I try to rectify some unaccurate points in the existing accuse, and add to some information. In addition, I inspect separately Ji Xian’s poetic text in prewar, wartime, and postwar, to find some messages inside his mind. Finally, I propose we break away from the entanglement of hanjian-discourse, then just pay attention to whether one do prudential calculation on community benefit, and profound introspection on individual life, and I think, Ji Xian was not prudential or profound. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。