查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 國際法院規約第62條的適用問題--以訴訟參加申請國的舉證責任為中心=Issues on the Application of Article 62 of the ICJ Statue Focusing on the Burden of Proof of the Intervening State |
---|---|
作 者 | 李明峻; | 書刊名 | 臺灣國際法季刊 |
卷 期 | 4:4 2007.12[民96.12] |
頁 次 | 頁97-128 |
分類號 | 579.9 |
關鍵詞 | 國際裁判; 第三國訴訟參加制度; 國際法院規約第62條; 管轄權; 舉證責任; International adjudication; Third state intervention scheme; ICJ statue article 62; Jurisdiction; The burden of proof; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 在國際裁判制度中,當與其他國家的訴訟案具有法律利益關係的國家,爲保護其自身的利益而參與該訴訟者,是爲第三國訴訟參加制度,其目的是爲保護非原訴訟當事國的第三國權益。關於第三國參加訴訟制度,《國際法院規約》採用兩種方式:其一是利害關係國基於法院許可而參加訴訟的方式(第62條);其二是締約國在條約解釋出現問題時的參加訴訟方式(第63條)。迄2007年爲止,過去基於規約第62條申請參加訴訟的實例,在國際法院共有六個案件進行實質審理,但得到許可的只有尼加拉瓜申請參加領土‧島嶼‧海洋劃界爭端案,以及赤道幾內亞申請參加喀麥隆vs奈及利亞的領土/海洋境界案等兩次,究竟是何種原因限制國際法院規約第62條的普遍適用?本文旨在探討此一制度中的各項問題,特別是以訴訟參加申請國的舉證責任爲中心,並對國際法院規約第62條的適用問題,提出明確的具體解決建議。 |
英文摘要 | In the international adjudications, when a state considers its legal interests may be affected in a pending case, it may choose to intervene in the case for securing its national interests. According to the Statue of the International Court of Justice, two approaches to intervene are provided. The first approach provided by Article 62 of the Statue is that when a third state considers its legal interests may be affected by the decision of the Court, it may request to be permitted to intervene. The second approach provided by the Article 63 of the Statue is that whenever the construction of a convention to which states other than those concerned in the case are parties is in question, it may intervene in the proceeding. Among six cases concerning intervention based on the Article 62 of the Statue until 2007, there are only two cases in which the intervening state's request is permitted: one is the case on "Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute (El Salvador/Honduras: Nicaragua intervening)," and the other one is the case on "Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Cameroon v. Nigeria: Equatorial Guinea intervening)." With the background like this, it is worth discussing what restricts the application of article 62 of the ICJ statue. Specifically speaking, the purpose of this article is to survey relevant issues on the intervention scheme, and the special focus will be put on the burden of proof of the intervening state. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。