頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 刑法中的行為無價值與結果無價值=Invalidity of Conduct and Invalidity of Consequence in Criminal Law |
---|---|
作者 | 王安異; | 書刊名 | 東吳法律學報 |
卷期 | 16:1 2004.08[民93.08] |
頁次 | 頁45-88 |
分類號 | 587.14 |
關鍵詞 | 客觀不法論; 行為無價值論; 結果無價值論; 二元論; 功能性選擇; Objective illegal theory; Invalidity of conduct; Invalidity of consequence; Binary theory; Functional selection; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 為了維護犯罪論體系上“不法是客觀的、責任是主觀的”這一傳統命題,行為無價值論與結果無價值論之間進行一系列的論爭,對傳統命題進行了一些新的詮釋或修正,其中比較有影響的學說有古典不法論、人的不法論、社會不法論等,本文系統介紹了這些理論、分別指出其理論缺陷,并得出結論:任何一種理論都不可能真正消除行為無價值與結果無價值之間的對立,只有按照二者的功能進行取捨,才能最終解決問題,這要求結合主觀不法要素和客觀不法要素兩方面來認定不法。 |
英文摘要 | In order to maintain the orthodox proposition “illegality is objective and duty is subjective" in the system of criminal law, invalidity of conduct has engaged invalidity of consequence in a series of controversies, which has reinterpreted and modified orthodox proposition. Some notable theories of them include classical illegal theory, illegal theory of person, social illegal theory etc. The paper introduces these theories systematically and points out theoretical defect in them respectively. Finally, it makes the conclusion that only by grasping the function of both can the problem be solved eventually and illegality should be determined by combining subjective illegal elements with objective illegal elements. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。