頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 論美國印地安納州法院裁定執行不定期鑑定留置命令之合法性--以Jackson訴Indiana案為例=A Study of Indiana Commitment Procedures--Jackson v. Indiana Case |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 邱佩俞; | 書刊名 | 警專學報 |
卷期 | 4:5 2009.04[民98.04] |
頁次 | 頁219-232 |
分類號 | 587.834 |
關鍵詞 | 不定期鑑定留置; 精神疾患; 心神喪失; 平等保護; 正當程序; Indefinite commitment; Mentally ill; Insanity; Equal protection; Due process; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 論文摘要 Theon Jackson 為一精神狀態不穩定且不具閱讀、書寫及簡單溝通能力之瘖啞人 士,被控犯下2 項罪名並被印地安納州法院依據Ind.Ann.stat. §9-1760a 裁定執行鑑 定留置之命令。法院以Theon Jackson 欠缺一般理解能力,足堪影響審判程序之進行 為由,裁定暫停審判程序之進行並將其交由州立精神收容機構予以觀察,直至其精 神狀態回復足堪審判程序之進行,方得解除鑑定留置之命令。Theon Jackson 的辯護 律師提出重開審判之請求,不但遭到法院駁回,印地安納州最高法院於調閱該案卷 證後,仍決議維持原審判決。筆者茲從Jackson 訴Indiana 案的案例事實、爭點、美 國聯邦最高法院裁判理由、印地安納州鑑定留置程序、平等保護原則及正當程序原 則之意涵、美國聯邦最高法院見解等層面切入,論述印地安納州最高法院對於Theon Jackson,裁定執行不定期鑑定留置之命令,是否剝奪其法律平等保護及正當程序之 權利? |
英文摘要 | ABSTRACT Petitioner, Theon Jackson, in this case, a mentally defective deaf mute, who cannot read, write, or virtually otherwise communicate was charged with two criminal offenses and committed under the §9-1760a procedure. After finding that petitioner lacked comprehension sufficient to make his defense, the court ordered petitioner committed until such time as the health department could certify petitioner’s sanity to the court. Petitioner’s counsel filed a motion for a new trial, which was denied. The State Supreme Court affirmed. In view of the fact, issues, holding, rationale for thedecision, Indiana commitment procedures, equal protection, due process, disposition of the charges, let us then consider the court ordered petitioner committed under §9-1760a is for the best interest of petitioner or derived him of equal protection and due process. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。