查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 虛遷戶籍而投票之可罰性=The Punishability of the Act of Changing Domicile for the Purpose of Qualifying as an Elector |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 薛智仁; | 書刊名 | 法學新論 |
| 卷 期 | 7 2009.02[民98.02] |
| 頁 次 | 頁77-103 |
| 分類號 | 585.255 |
| 關鍵詞 | 虛偽遷徙戶籍; 無權投票; 妨害投票結果正確罪; Changing domicile for the purpose of qualifying as an elector; Not qualifying as an elector; Offence of interference with voting; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 基於選舉目的而虛遷戶籍者之投票構成妨害投票結果正確罪,是最高法院向來的見解,立法者亦透過增訂刑法第一四六條第二項接受此看法。本文主張,此一肯定可罰性的結論值得贊同;但論證應予補充及修正,並且同時適用於所有虛遷戶籍者之投票及參選行為。至於多數文獻對最高法院見解的批評,則是忽略居住事實始具創設選舉人資格之效力,也誤用憲法上遷徙自由與選舉自由的主張。儘管如此,增訂第一四六條第二項則是徒然製造問題的修法,未來立法上宜再度刪除,同步修正第一項之文字。 |
| 英文摘要 | The act of changing domicile for the purpose of qualifying as an elector constitutes the offence of interference with voting. Sufficient Supreme Court precedents have been established and accepted by the congress to add paragraph 2 to Article 146 of the Criminal Code. This article agrees with the conclusion that such act is punishable but argues that the reasoning there behind should be modified and supplemented, and the offence should be applicable to acts of changing domicile for the purpose of qualifying as an elector or as a candidate. The critics of many literatures about the opinion of the Supreme Court ignore that actual residency is a requirement to be a qualified candidate, and also misuse the freedom of migration and the freedom of election provided for under the constitution. Nonetheless, adding paragraph 2 to Article 146 only creates confusion. Consequently, in the future, said paragraph should be deleted and the wording in paragraph 1 should be amended. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。