頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 教育理論及其建構途徑=Educational Theory and the Ways to Construct It |
---|---|
作 者 | 潘世尊; | 書刊名 | 臺東大學教育學報 |
卷 期 | 16:1 2005.06[民94.06] |
頁 次 | 頁151-188 |
分類號 | 520.1 |
關鍵詞 | 教育理論; 理論與實務; 理論與實踐; 行動研究; Educational theory; Theory and practice; Theory and praxis; Action research; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文旨在探討教育理論及其建構途的相關問題。所探討者,主要由但昭偉所著<教育理論的建構及教育實作>此篇論文所引發,包含:(1)教育研究的對象:實事v.s.價值?(2)教育理論的內含:實然v.s. 應然?(3)教育理論與學科的關係:附屬v.s.含攝?(4)教育理論的建構者:外來者v.s. 教育實務工作者?(5)教育理論的性質:個人知識v.s. 公眾理論?(6)依但昭偉所揭示途建構教育理論的過程中,可能面臨何種問題以及如何迿是?除了上述,如格教育理論與實務(或實踐)得到結合,以及如何使教育實務得到改等問題之討論,可說貫穿全文。其間,亦論及行為研究的相關概念。本文之探討乃以但昭偉上述有為基礎,涉及的問題難免受限。因此,筆者最後還揭示本文之限制以及未來可行的研究方向。 |
英文摘要 | The main purpose of this paper is to study some questions concerning education theory and the ways to construct it. The author first introduces and analyzes the article entitled ‘The construction of educational theories and educational practices’, written by J. W. Dan, and then further discusses questions generated form the article as follows: 1. what is the proper subject of educational research? ‘Fact’ or ‘Value’? 2. what is the attribute of educational theory? ‘Is’ or ‘Ought’? 3. What is the relationship between educational theory and other disciplines? Is educational theory subsidiary to other disciplines such as psychology, sociology, and philosophy? 4. Who should be or can be educational theory constructors? Those who are outsiders of educational situations or those who are ‘educational practitioners’? 5. what category should educational theory belong to? Can educational theory be considered as a kind of ‘Public theory’? 6. Making use of Dan’s viewpoints to construct educational theory, what problems may one encounter, and how does one solve them? In addition to these six questions, issues such as ‘how to combine educational theories and practice/praxis’, and ‘how to improve educational theories and practice’ are considered throughout this article. Concepts and strategies concerning educational action research are also discussed. Questions discussed in this paper are drawn on Dan’s work and therefore could be limited. The author thus suggests some probable directions for future research in conclusion. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。