頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 臺灣與香港小學教科書幾何教材之分析=A Content Analysis of Geometry Material in Elementary School Textbook of Taiwan and Hong Kong |
---|---|
作 者 | 徐偉民; 林美如; | 書刊名 | 屏東教育大學學報. 理工類 |
卷 期 | 28 2008.09[民97.09] |
頁 次 | 頁1-51 |
分類號 | 523.34316 |
關鍵詞 | 內容分析法; 國小教科書; 幾何教材; Content analysis; Elementary school textbook; Geometry material; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究旨在探討台灣與香港兩地數學科教科書,在幾何教材上呈現的情形。研究對象為台灣九年一貫課程康健版數學(化名)與香港現實版數學(化名)。以內容分析法進行分析,依內容分析類目表分析幾何教材的主要概念分布情形,進而探討兩地數學教科書中幾何教材所呈現的特徵。本研究發現: 一、兩地教材目標的組織順序皆符合van Hiele幾何概念思考模式。 二、兩地對形體辨認的鋪陳方式不同。 三、兩地空間概念的教材鋪陳不足。 四、香港較注重生活應用,趣味性高,且小學幾何教材的內容範圍比台灣深且廣。 五、台灣多呈現開放性的問題,且多以實際照片呈現。 |
英文摘要 | The study aims at comparing and contrasting geometry teaching materials in mathematics textbooks used in Hong Kong and Taiwan. The subjects of this study are the 21-century mathematics textbooks of elementary school used in Hong Kong and the Kang-Hsuan mathematics textbooks of elementary school used in Taiwan. The study analyzes the main ideas distributed in geometry materials by using content analysis, and further explores the characteristics presented in mathematic geometry materials. The findings of the study are as following: 1.The arrangements of the geometry materials both in Hong Kong and Taiwan match the geometry concept-thinking model of Van Hiele. 2.The arrangements of the identification of shapes differ in both areas. 3.Both of the presentations of the materials in two places lack of space concept. 4.The geometry materials in Hong Kong emphasize more application in real life and are lively. Its elementary geometry materials contain wider and deeper in contents than Taiwan. 5.There are more open questions, and mostly represented with practical pictures in the textbooks in Taiwan. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。