查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 巫言亂語--關於兩部長篇小說[朱天文著《巫言》、 舞鶴著《亂迷》 ]的評注
- Le Mouvement dans la Langue et Ses Implications Pedagogiques Ou Comment Apprendre A Composer
- The Characteristics of Newspaper English and Application to English Teaching: An Analysis Based on the Texts of Four English-language Newspapers
- 俗文學中神話的意義與基礎作用
- Linking L2/FL Reading and Writing
- Writing for Publishing: The Web Publications for Composition Classes
- 資訊教育中的創造思考學習歷程--理論探討與研究之分析
- A Sociolinguistic Study of the Argumentative Writing of Chinese Students
- 寫作修改教學研究及其實施成效
- 談如何旁徵博引、小題大作從事語言學研究論文之寫作
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 巫言亂語--關於兩部長篇小說[朱天文著《巫言》、 舞鶴著《亂迷》 ]的評注=Sorceress' Discourse and Messy Language: Comments and Notes on Two Novels |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 黃錦樹; | 書刊名 | 臺灣文學研究學報 |
卷期 | 7 2008.10[民97.10] |
頁次 | 頁235-261 |
分類號 | 823.68 |
關鍵詞 | 巫; 言; 寫作; 文學場域; 臺灣文學; Sorcerer; Language; Writing; Field of literature; Taiwan literature; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文以台灣當代文壇位居不同場域位子的兩位代表作家的新著—朱天文的《巫言》與舞鶴的《亂迷》為對比討論對象。兩個作家的文化資本、意識型態立場、美學信仰及對語言的態度均殊異,卻都自稱是巫者。且在各自新著的形成中均有過一番溝通對話。但真正的對話應是作品本身,或許這兩部作品涉及了這樣的問題:是否指出了作為文學語言的台灣華文,或中文,的一個可能的未來?對台灣長篇小說而言,有新的啟發嗎?另一方面,對作者而言,這部新著到底意味著甚麼?更新的實驗,還是自身話語機器的重複?兩位自稱是巫者的寫作人,到底視寫作為何物? |
英文摘要 | This paper intends to read comparatively Zhu Tianwen's and Wu He's latest novels, ”A Sorceress' Discourse” and ”Mess and Lost”. Representatives of two diverse fields in contemporary Taiwanese literature, Zhu and Wu He differ from each other in cultural capitalism, ideological stance, aesthetic poetics and the employment of language, yet they both claim themselves as ”sorcerer” and ”sorceress” respectively. Moreover, the formation of the novel invites a dialogue between the two writers. But the dialogue really lies in their works per se. The two novels actually allude to such questions: do they promise a possible future for Taiwanese Chinese, or Chinese as a literary language? Do they intrigue any inspiration to Taiwanese novels? On the other hand, as far as each writer is concerned, what is the significance of the latest work? A further experiment? Or a repetition of his or her own discourse machine? For the two writers who consider themselves ”sorcerer” and ”sorceress” respectively, what exactly do they think of the act of writing? |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。