查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 論遺棄罪之危險屬性=The Dangerous Attribute of the Abandonment Crime |
---|---|
作 者 | 王榮聖; | 書刊名 | 興大法學 |
卷 期 | 2 2007.11[民96.11] |
頁 次 | 頁239-284 |
分類號 | 585.417 |
關鍵詞 | 遺棄罪; 法律內在限制; 危險現實化指標; Abandonment crime; The legal intrinsic limitation; The target of the realization of the danger; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 關於遺棄罪之性質,向來在學說及實務上即多所爭議,其爭議焦點無非在於其性質究為「具體危險犯」抑或是「抽象危險犯」,此性質對其犯罪成立與否,影響甚鉅。惟其判斷,實則與危險犯規範之構成相關,尤其在二者之區別上。對此,本文認為「所有的危險犯規定,基本上都是屬於抽象危險犯之規範型態,亦即以其行為危險性之屬性而被規定為犯罪」,同時對於抽象危險犯亦有于以「實質判斷」之必要,故提出「法律内在限制」與「危險現實化指標」之看法,對二者性質之判斷亦提出實際判斷流程之說明,並輔之以現行法上危險犯規定之檢證,以資為遺棄罪危險屬性判定之佐證。 |
英文摘要 | Nature of the abandonment crime always disnuied in the theory and the practice that, its dispute focal point lies in judging its nature to be “the concrete danger offence” or be “the abstract danger offence.. The judgment of its nature affects to its crime establishment greatly. Regarding this, this article thought "all danger offences a regulation decide, basically all is belongs to the abstract danger offence” and violates regarding the abstract danger also has “the substantive judgment” the necessity, therefore proposed "the legal intrinsic limitation” and “the target of the realization of the danger” the view to judge the two nature as a means of evidence of as the abandonment crime dangerous attribute determination. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。