查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 法律、融貫性與權威=Law, Coherence, and Authority |
---|---|
作 者 | 王鵬翔; | 書刊名 | 政治與社會哲學評論 |
卷 期 | 24 2008.03[民97.03] |
頁 次 | 頁23-68 |
分類號 | 580.11 |
關鍵詞 | 德沃金; 拉茲; 原則一貫性; 融貫性; 權威; 法實證主義; 法概念; Dworkin; Raz; Integrity; Coherence; Authority; Legal positivism; The concept of law; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | Ronald Dworkin法律哲學的核心主張「法律作為原則一貫性」(Law as Integrity,又譯為「整全法」)向來被視為一種法律的融貫論(a coherence theory of law)。對於Dworkin法律融貫論的主要挑戰之一是Joseph Raz的權威論據。Raz認為,Dworkin的原則一貫性理論無法說明法律的權威本質。Raz對於Dworkin的批評是否能夠成立,以及Dworkin式的融貫論要如何回應權威論據的挑戰,是本文所要探討的問題。本文首先歸納了Dworkin法律融貫論的幾個主要論點,其次討論Raz基於權威論據對於Dworkin融貫論的批評,除了介紹Dworkin自己對此一批評的回應之外,我也嘗試提出其它的論據(重構命題與正確衡量命題)來辯護Dworkin式的法律融貫論。本文最後則簡單討論了融貫命題與法之概念(the concepts of law)的關係。 |
英文摘要 | The core tenet of Ronald Dworkin's legal philosophy "Law as Integrity" is usually regarded as a coherence theory of law. One of the positivistic challenges to Dworkin's coherence theory of law is Joseph Raz's argument from authority. Raz claims that Dworkin's theory of Law as Integrity cannot give a satisfactory account of the authoritative nature of law. The main issue of this essay is whether Raz's criticism is justified and how to defend the Dworkinian coherence thesis against Raz's attack. In this essay I will firstly summarize the main theses of Dworkin's coherence theory and then discuss Raz's authority-based arguments. Besides referring to Dworkin's reply, I will propose my own arguments (the reconstruction thesis and the correct balance thesis) to show how a Dworkinian coherence theory can meet Raz's challenge. The final part of this essay is a brief discussion about the relation between the coherence thesis and the concepts of law. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。