查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 通用型、分類及次分類供應商評選模式之比較--以臺灣電源供應器製造商為研究對象
- JIT與平衡計分卡之應用探討
- 跨世紀管理控制新方法--平衡計分卡規劃與設計之本土經驗
- 從平衡計分卡理論談會計教育績效指標之釐訂
- 國營事業績效考評指標的探討--兼談中央健康保險局及勞工保險局個案
- 中小型醫院經營策略與營運績效之探討--以平衡記分卡觀點分析
- Research and Development Strategy and Performance Measures: An Empirical Test of the Balanced Scorecard Concepts
- 平衡計分卡在中國信託
- 探索實施平衡計分卡可能遭遇之問題
- 策略為焦點的組織--平衡計分卡式的公司如何在新企業環境中取勝[Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton, «The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment»]
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 通用型、分類及次分類供應商評選模式之比較--以臺灣電源供應器製造商為研究對象=A Study on the Performance of Supplier Evaluation Models with Different Categorization Scales--An Empirical Study of Taiwanese Power Supply Manufacturers |
---|---|
作 者 | 何應欽; 王文博; 張歐權; | 書刊名 | 商管科技季刊 |
卷 期 | 9:3 2008.09[民97.09] |
頁 次 | 頁379-416 |
分類號 | 494.542 |
關鍵詞 | 供應商評量; 供應商分類; Kanji企業計分卡; 平衡計分卡; Supplier evaluation; Supplier categorization; Kanji business scorecard; KBS; Balanced scorecard; BSC; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 電子產品是由許多不同類別零組件組裝而成。多數電子產品製造商對不同類別零組件的供應商,並不分類評估其績效,也不瞭解不同分類的供應商評量模式對績效評量的影響。另外,雖然多數電子產品製造商有其供應商評量模式,但因非常(甚至完全)仰賴人類專家,而常有穩定性與公正性不佳的問題。本研究以台灣電源供應器製造商與其供應商為研究對象,對本研究所提出之供應商評量模式進行檢驗,並探討不同分類程度的供應商評量模式對績效評量效果的影響。本研究提出一套結合平衡計分卡(Balanced Scorecard,BSC)與Kanii 企業計分卡(Kanji Business Scorecard,KBS)的供應商評量模式(吾人稱之為「BSC 評量模式」),以解決電源供應器製造商非常(甚至完全)仰賴人類專家的缺點,並補救傳統評量模式不足之處。本研究的結果發現:(1)將供應商分為四個次分類之「BSC 評量模式」,其評量績效優於將供應商分為兩個分類之「BSC 評量模式」,且更優於不對供應商分類之通用型「BSC 評量模式」(2)次分類之「BSC 評量模式」評量績效不僅是最優的,也最接近人類專家的評量績效,此結果也證明本研究所發展的「BSC 評量模式」之正確性與有效性;(3)最後,本研究也發現採用與供應商之所屬分類別相應之「BSC 評量模式」,其評量效果是優於非相應之「BSC 評量模式」。 |
英文摘要 | Power supplies are made up of many components that are supplied by many suppliers. Thus, the success of a power supply manufacturer replies very much on the collaboration and cooperation of its suppliers. As a result, one important issue that arises is how to select good suppliers that a power supply manufacturer can depend on. In practice, many power supply manufacturers have their own evaluation models or methods for this purpose. However, their supplier-evaluation models or methods may not work very well for various reasons, e.g. relying too much on human experts. Furthermore, many power supply manufacturers often apply one evaluation model or method for all categories of suppliers. In other words, the possible benefits of applying different evaluation models or methods to different categories of suppliers have never been investigated. In this paper, we propose a supplier evaluation model that combines the structure and dimensions of Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and the concept of Kanji Business Scorecard (KBS) and we adopt the AHP method to help us build up the evaluation model. We then test the model's validity and performance on Taiwanese power supply manufacturers. The test result shows that the proposed evaluation model can evaluate suppliers very correctly. We also find that better evaluation results can be obtained if one categorizes the suppliers into smaller categories, then applies evaluation models specifically for these categories. And, the smaller the categories, the better the evaluation results of the evaluation models. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。