頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 孩子,我是為你好--家長主義與解放論之爭議=It's Good for You, My Child--The Controversy between Paternalism and Liberationism |
---|---|
作 者 | 黃聿芝; | 書刊名 | 教育研究 |
卷 期 | 16 2008.06[民97.06] |
頁 次 | 頁163-171 |
分類號 | 521.55 |
關鍵詞 | 兒童權利; 家長主義; 家長權力; 解放論; Children's rights; Liberationism; Paternalism; Paternal power; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文主要闡釋家長主義與解放論對於「兒童是否能享有成人權利」的主張。家長主義認為兒童是未成熟的個體,仍需在成人指導照護下成長,提出以「年齡」與「能力」作為兒童是否能享有與成人平等權利的門檻;解放論則質疑家長主義「以干預方式保護兒童」的主張,認為家長主義堅稱兒童的不成熟、未達理性僅是一種文化偏見,是以某種成人的標準來定義兒童、支配兒童。 本文結語提出「能力門檻」最根本的問題是如何客觀衡量「能力」?在公領域方面,採取「年齡門檻」的指標似乎是較公允的做法;在私領域方面則強調「尊重兒童」的必要性,宜適時讓孩子自由抉擇,並自我負責。 |
英文摘要 | This article is to discuss an argument of "way children can't possess the same right as adults have". The argument of paternalism is to reject equal rights of children by age and ability restriction because children are "immature individuals"; therefore, adults' interference is needed. Liberationism directed against Paternalism's argument by attacking interfering protection type and emphasizes that Paternalism's argument is a bias of culture. It's a standard of adult and causes an oppression problem to children. The basic problem of ability threshold is how to judge ability objectively. In the public sphere, to take the norm of "age" seems to be more equal standard. In the private sphere, we must respect children's interests; and further, let children make their own decision and take responsibility for it. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。