查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 美國「兩中」政策與「中國雙重代表權」形成過程之研究(1950~1968)
- 聯合國「中國代表權問題」之回顧與研究(1950~1971)--臺北從漢賊不兩立至接受雙重代表權之始末
- 聯合國「中國代表權問題」之研究--美、中「漢賊不兩立」至「雙重代表案」之轉向策略分析
- 臺北「兩個中國」政策之研究(1971~2005)--論「雙重代表案」與「平行代表權」之執行
- The Question of Chinese Representation in the United Nations
- 蔣介石與1961年聯合國中國代表權問題
- 我國參與世界衛生組織之研究
- 中共對聯合國中國代表權問題中「雙重代表」案的立場與影響
- 2758號決議、雙重代表權案與臺灣地位問題
- 聯合國中國代表權問題產生背景及初期發展
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 聯合國「中國代表權問題」之研究--美、中「漢賊不兩立」至「雙重代表案」之轉向策略分析=A Study on the Question of Representation of China in the United Nations: Analysis of U.S.-R.O.C. Strategic Shift from "No Negotiation" toward "Dual Representation" |
---|---|
作 者 | 涂成吉; | 書刊名 | 萬竅 |
卷 期 | 7 2008.05[民97.05] |
頁 次 | 頁49-70 |
分類號 | 578.14 |
關鍵詞 | 中國代表權問題; 緩議案; 重要問題案; 研究委員會案; 雙重代表權; 阿爾巴尼亞案; The question of representation of China; Moratorium; Important question; Study committee; Dual representation; Universality principle; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 一九七一年十月第二十六屆聯合國大會,台北期望以「雙重代表案」(Dual Representation)保衛聯合國會籍失利後,從此離開聯合國。近代史上有關我國在聯合國最後會籍奮戰中,對「雙重代表權」的真實態度,向來是諱莫如深,到底國府是始終「漢賊不兩立」地抗拒?抑或全盤接受美國「兩國兩席」安排?加上當今國內政治情勢在入聯、返聯爭論激情之餘,對這段過往情勢,人云亦云,語焉不詳,本文目的除探究我國與聯合國中國代表權問題的歷史爭議外,尤聚焦研究於台北當局對雙重代表案之真正態度,經資料還原可考,事實是美台高層之關鍵爭執在於國府只願予中共一般會員國權利;安理會席位上,國府是堅持不讓,抗拒到底的;只是無奈形勢比人強,美國也不能真心支持,大玩兩面外交,竟由漢賊不兩立,淪至賊立而漢不立,黯然離開聯合國。 |
英文摘要 | In 1971, Washington authorities intended to shift tactics toward “dual representation” after a series of expedient strategies such as “Moratorium”, “Important Question” and “Study Committee” over the past 20 years failed to guard ROC’s seat in the UN. But the concept of “dual representation” was totally incompatible with Chang, Kai-shek’s position on UN Chinese representation question- “rather be a jade broken than an earthen tile intact”. Accordingly, the purpose of this paper is to clarify Taipei government’s real attitude and practice toward dual representation which became a “historical ambiguity” for many decades since then. Based on lately declassified official papers from Taipei and Washington governments respectively, we discovered Taipei was willing to coexist with PRC in the U.N., but refused adamantly to give away the seat of Security Council. Taipei government insisted on preserving his seat in the Security Council almost to the last moment before the 26th UN General Assembly declared open. Hesitation to decisive change by Taipei and lack of real-heart support from the Nixon-Kissinger administration led to the UN Resolution 2758 that PRC replaced ROC as the sole member in the U.N. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。