查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 性侵害防治相關體系處遇智能障礙被害案件在司法上所面臨的困境與需求
- 社工員執行智能障礙者性侵害防治工作所面臨的困境與需求
- 相關防治體系所知覺的教育專業執行防治智能障礙者遭受性侵害工作所面臨的需求
- 憲兵隊處理性侵害案件被害者之保護措施--以減述作業為例
- 比較採用實境訓練與角色扮演訓練的性侵害防治課程對智能障礙高職女學生自我保護能力提升成效之研究
- 探討「人身安全保護及性侵害防治」教材對高職特教班學生之性教育介入效果
- 桃園與雲嘉地區具備口語能力的國中特教班智能障礙女學生性侵害防治知識表現之現況初探
- 家屬所知覺的性侵害事件對智能障礙受害者心理影響之初探研究
- 當智能障礙者被性侵害之後--談家屬所知覺的社會工作服務需求
- 特殊教育學校高職部學生性侵害防治教育學習效果之研究
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 性侵害防治相關體系處遇智能障礙被害案件在司法上所面臨的困境與需求=The Challenges and Requirements Facing with Judiciary Professionals While Working with Sexual Abuse Victims with Intellectual Disabilities |
---|---|
作者 | 劉文英; | 書刊名 | 臺大社會工作學刊 |
卷期 | 17 2008.06[民97.06] |
頁次 | 頁93-130 |
分類號 | 548.544 |
關鍵詞 | 智能障礙; 性侵害; 司法體系; 跨專業合作團隊; Sexual abuse; Intellectual disabilities; Judiciary system; Multidisciplinary team; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 智能障礙者為遭受性侵害的高危險群,然而此類型案件卻容易因智能障礙者的認知與溝通功能低下而不易遭到起訴,本研究旨在探討社政、警政、司法、教育各防治體系處遇智能障礙性侵害被害件時在警政與司法工作所面臨的困境與需求。研究方法採用質性研究法的焦點團體訪談針對52位防治工作人員蒐集資料。研究結果發現針對警政與司法工作,目前防治工作的困境為:(1)智能障礙者的證詞反覆特性影響性侵害防治工作的突破;(2)減述作業未加落實;(3)司法偵訊態度存在迷思;(4)司法偵訊用語不適合智能障礙者的溝通能力;以及(5)智能障礙受害者人權未獲尊重。而其因應的工作需求則為:(1)增加瞭解智能障礙特性的在職訓練;(2)增進偵訊智能障礙者的司法人員態度與環境;(3)加強辦理與參與網絡研習;以及(4)改進司法審理智能障礙被害案件之證據形式。最後文中亦探討了對實務工作的建議。 |
英文摘要 | People with intellectual disabilities are at high-risk of being victims of sexual abuse. However, the cases were not easily prosecuted because of the victims' low communicative function. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the challenges and requirements facing with judiciary professionals when working with sexual abuse victims with intellectual disabilities. This study employed a qualitative method of focus group interviews to collect data from fifty-two interviewees. The results showed the judiciary challenges of working with people with intellectual disability included the followings: (1) Their disabilities rendered them unable to provide reliable evidence for prosecution; (2) The statement reduction for victims must be implemented; (3) The investigatory attitude of case investigators was not fair for the disabled victims; (4) The investigatory language was too difficult for the victims to understand; and (5) The right of victims with intellectual disabilities was not concerned all through the process of investigation. In addition, four requirements toward judiciary system were arrived to prevent more people with intellectual disability from sexual victimization: (1) Improve the in-service training for judiciary professionals about the characteristics of people with intellectual disabilities; (2) Improve the attitude toward victims and environment during investigation; (3) Take importance on the transaction and participation of multidisciplinary team meetings; and (4) Improve the evidence-gathering work when dealing with victims with intellectual disability. Finally, the suggestions toward practices were discussed in this paper. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。