頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 東漢末年的荊州問題析論--兼談「借荊州」事件的真偽=The Territory Problem of the State of Jin at the End of the Eastern Han Period: Truth& Falsity about "The State of Jin Lending Event" |
---|---|
作者 | 萬穎中; | 書刊名 | 淡江人文社會學刊 |
卷期 | 33 2008.03[民97.03] |
頁次 | 頁1-38 |
分類號 | 622.3 |
關鍵詞 | 孫權; 劉備; 三國時代; 借荊州; 軍事戰略研究; 軍事史; Three Kingdoms period; The state of Jin lending event; Strategy study; Military history; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 無論從歷史亦或小說的角度切入,東漢末年的荊州問題乃是一般膾炙人口的篇章,然坊間所流傳的「劉備借荊州--有借無還」的說法不僅不實,甚至是一種被現存史料所誤導的曲論。筆者則依據孫劉兩方政軍利益之衝突點和各階段的歷史情節,先點出荊州地區的敏感性,接著釐清兩造之主權歸屬,最後則提出所謂「借荊州」,實乃孫劉雙方就爭議地區行「領土交換」,而非世間所盛傳的「單方質借」,同時也填補了清代趙翼、今人黎東方所無法觀察到的論點縫隙。事實證明:《三國志》內就荊州糾紛所記載的孫吳方史料,實有替孫權掩飾、維護之嫌,目的就如同趙、黎二人所強調的:要湮沒孫權侵奪盟友領地之醜。 |
英文摘要 | Whether from historical or literary dimensions, the territory problem of the State of Jin at the end of the Eastern Han period was very famous, but the whole record was ambiguously distorted because the Sun-Wu Kingodm's monarch, Sun Quan, and his official historians would like to mislead the truth purposely by libeling Liu Bei, the leader of Shu-Han Kingdom, as a mistrustful politician on occupying Sun-Wu's land permanently. Zhao Yi, a researcher in the Ch'ing Dynasty, first raised this question, and Prof. Li Tung-Fang agreed with it. However, they didn't provide strong evidence in their writing to support their viewpoints. This paper is written to help solve this myth. At first, the writer analyzes the political and military sensitivities of this area according to strategy approach, then checks every wrong record about sovereign arguments of the State of Jin in The History of Three Kingdoms from a historical method, and corrects them. After studying, the writer considers that: "The State of Jin Lending Event" should be re-titled to "Disputing Territories Exchanging Event", which was started from the political corruption of Sun-Wu in A.D. 209 who illegally invaded its ally--the Shu-Han Kingdom's land. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。