查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 國際智慧財產權訴訟之國際管轄權決定、準據法選擇與法律適用之問題
- 涉外股東臨時會決議之管轄權與準據法決定--最高法院九十八年臺上字第二二五九號民事判決評釋
- 涉外事件的管轄權及準據法--最高法院九十八年臺上字第二二五九號民事判決
- 由國際私法觀點論盜贓文化資產之回復問題
- 外國法人、侵權行為與債權行為的準據法--最高法院九十九年臺上字第一三五二號民事判決
- 涉外民事事件之當事人適格問題--最高法院八十三年度臺上字第一六九號、八十六年度臺上字第三七八九號判決評釋
- 國際私法連繫因素實體化初論--以涉外侵權行為選法規範為中心
- 認領準據法之研究
- 海牙國際私法公約之研究--以一九七八年海牙關於夫妻財產制之國際私法公約為中心
- 船舶碰撞問題研究
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 國際智慧財產權訴訟之國際管轄權決定、準據法選擇與法律適用之問題=The International Jurisdiction﹐Applicable Law and the Relevant Issues in the Application of Law in International Intellectual Property Rights Litigations |
---|---|
作 者 | 許耀明; | 書刊名 | 玄奘法律學報 |
卷 期 | 8 2007.12[民96.12] |
頁 次 | 頁57-105 |
分類號 | 588.3 |
關鍵詞 | 智慧財產權; 國際私法; 國際管轄; 準據法; 公序條款; Intellectual property rights; Private international law; International jurisdiction; Applicable law; Ordre public clause; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文從智慧財產權之特殊本質出發,討論各種國際智慧財產權訴訟之直接管轄權決定、準據法選擇與準據法適用問題,並論及該等外國裁判在承認地國獲承認與執行之要件。本文主張,直接管轄權之認定宜採多元標準,不宜採專屬管轄,而再由管轄積極衝突法則解決。在準據法部分,本文依不同訴訟類型,提出不同準據法,而主張此等準據法適用,需受法庭地法國智慧財產權法制中攸關公益部分之限制。因此,在外國判決之承認與執行上,依前述直接管轄權判斷標準'關於管轄權有無之判斷應寬鬆,但關於實體正義部分則可有承認國之特殊公益考量。本文結論指出,關於國際智慧財產權訴訟之直接管轄權決定、準據法決定與其適用,甚至判決之承認與執行,目前國際問仍眾說紛耘,但此一多元之發展,適可為我國日後修正涉外民事法律適用法或解決此類紛爭之參考。 |
英文摘要 | On considering the nature of intellectual property, rights, this article tries to illustrate the principles for deciding the international jurisdictions, the applicable laws in the international intellectual property rights disputes, and the conditions for the recognition and enforcement of the judgments of such disputes. For the decision of international direct jurisdictions, this article proposes a pluralistic way to allow all the possible fori to have jurisdiction and rejects the criteria of exclusive jurisdiction, accompanied with the principles for the resolution of possible conflicts of jurisdictions. For finding the applicable laws, this article distinguishes the different types of disputes and identifies the possible applicable laws according to the types of disputes, in condition that such an application should be limited by the necessary and specific public interest of each country where the suit is claimed. Therefore, on the recognition and enforcement of such a judgment, it is natural to admit all the possible direct jurisdictions but to limit it by the considerations of public policy. In sum, this article concludes the pluralistic way of private international law in the international intellectual property rights disputes and contributes that to the references for the future amendments of Taiwan's private international law code. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。