查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Taiwan's Approach to FTA
- Free Trade Agreements and the Environment: Some Implications to Taiwan
- WTO服務貿易與開發中國家
- 中國對外經貿新戰略與政策體系的完善
- Towards an Increasing Collaboration at WTO Negotiating Forums: The Case of China and India
- Free Trade Agreements: New Zealand's Experience in the Asia-Pacific Region
- 中國大陸加入WTO評述
- 世界貿易組織與北美自由貿易協定有關競爭規範之架構比較
- 中國大陸與世界貿易組織
- 兩岸統合的前景
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 中國對外經貿新戰略與政策體系的完善=China's New Foreign Trade Strategy and the Improvement of Policy-Making Mechanism |
---|---|
作 者 | 張漢林; | 書刊名 | WTO研究 |
卷 期 | 8 2007[民96] |
頁 次 | 頁1-27 |
分類號 | 558.1 |
關鍵詞 | 中國; 自由貿易協定; 世界貿易組織; China; WTO; FTA; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 從經濟角度來看,中國經濟崛起的趨勢已經不可阻擋,已經不存在不可逾越的障礙。新的勢力的崛起必定引起國際經濟政治格局的動盪。中國將在資源和市場等各個方面向現有的格局發起衝擊。因此,來自現有發達國家,甚至發展中國家勢力的壓力和抑制,是中國經濟崛起過程中必然要面對的,也是必須要跨過的。從這個大的背景來看,近期不斷湧現的貿易摩擦和爭端也就不難理解了。典型的如近期的紡織品摩擦,就不完全是經濟問題,而是政治問題,不僅僅涉及中國與歐美等發達國家,也包含了與中國競爭的發展中國家的利益。由此可見,在中國經濟崛起的過程中,如何適時、合理得調整對外經貿政策,事關中國經濟崛起的大局,值得進行深刻的反思。 然而,改革開放以來,從整體上而言,中國尚未形成比較系統、完整的貿易政策體系。可以說,中國的宏觀貿易政策並不明確,或者說至今尚無明確的權威的提法。就目前的實際情況來看,中國 現行的貿易政策是“重商主義”傾向加上“貿易自由化”旗幟。 雖然從政府層面和學術界,很少提及中國貿易政策的“重商主義”實質,但從“千方百計擴大出口”、“市場多元化”等口號以及中國貿易順差和外匯儲備的積累的現實來看,中國貿易政策的“重商主義”傾向是勿庸置疑的。對於中國這樣的中央集權國家來說,“指標經濟”更使得這種“重商主義”傾向發揮到了極至。在“重商主義”信念的支撐下,中國成為“貿易自由化”的堅定信仰者和最主要的擁護者之一。與此相對應的是,中國外貿增長速度超常規發展。同時,國際社會做出了強烈的反應,貿易摩擦和爭端將成為常態。 |
英文摘要 | From an economic perspective, China 's economic emergence is an unstoppable trend for there are no unsurmountable obstacles in existence. A newly surging force inevitably brings about impacts on international political and economic structure such as resources, market and other dimensions as well. Hence, pressure and restraint from developed countries and even from developing countries is a natural stumbling block that China has to encounter and overcome in its process of economic emergence. Against this macro background, it is not hard to comprehend mounting trade friction and disputes between China and other economies. Typical example of this is the recent trade friction over textile products. This is not just an economic issue, but a political one as well. It involves not only China and developed countries led by the United States and Europe, but also interests of those developing countries who are competing with China in this sector. As a result, how to properly and reasonably adjust China 's foreign economic and trade policy in the process of its economic emergence is a matter of great significance and worth deep consideration. However, China on the while has not built a relatively systematic and comprehensive trade policy mechanism yet, since it opened door and engaged in economic reform. In other words, China 's macro trade policy is not specific. In fact, China 's current trade policy is characterized by mercantilist orientation under the banner of trade liberalization. Though few people in governmental agencies and academic circle mention the mercantilist substance of China's trade policy, it is no doubt that China's trade policy is mercantilism-oriented if you view it from slogans such as “expanding exports in every possible way” and “diversifying markets” as well as China's huge trade surplus and accumulated foreign reserves. As an authoritative state, China 's economy has made mercantilism display to its utmost. In this paper, China is suggested to build a managed trade and investment liberalization policy mechanism for there is a need for government to properly manage trade at the macro level in the process of trade liberalization in order to reduce risk and impact. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。