查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 重建政府體制定位判準之芻議=An Attempt to Reestablish Criteria for the Judgment on the Orientation of a Governmental System |
---|---|
作 者 | 張茂霖; | 書刊名 | 中華技術學院學報 |
卷 期 | 36 2007.06[民96.06] |
頁 次 | 頁483-498 |
分類號 | 581.24 |
關鍵詞 | 憲法解釋; 政府體制; 判斷標準; Constitutional interpretation; Governmental system; Criteria for judgment; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 關於我國政府體制之定位,一直是各方爭論不休的問題。行政院固為我國行為使行政權之中樞機關,但是否即為行政權之最高機關,仍有爭議;此一爭議,常以「總統制」對「(議會)內閣制」爭論的型態出現。其實,欲依據憲法條文對政府體制之定位進行判斷,這是屬於憲法解釋學的範圍,因此,在解釋方法上,必須運用法學邏輯三段論,以推求其結論。然而,釋憲操作之時,必須仰賴具體可靠的政體判斷標準為大前提。 鑑於過去政治實務及學術各界所使用的政體判斷標準,實際上並不精細,本文擬檢討傳統的政體判斷方法,並嘗試重建較為具體可靠的判斷標準,以利政體定位釋憲工作之進行。 |
英文摘要 | The orientation of the ROC’s governmental system has long been in controversy, Some scholars argue that, it is a parliaments-styled system based on the Constitution. Others, however, insist that, it is a president-styled one. As it is a task of constitutional interpretation to render judgment on a governmental system, the syllogism of the legal method should be used to solve this problem. Suitable criteria should be brought-in for the use of a major premise. In view of the features exercised to make judgment on the orientation of a governmental system are insufficient for coming to a certain conclusion, the author attempts to review and improve the relevant features to them. In addition, the author also seeks to reestablish general criteria for the judgment on the orientation of a governmental system. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。