查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 醫學系筆試多項選擇題品質分析=Quality Analysis of Multiple-Choice Questions in a Medical School |
---|---|
作者 | 林朝順; 鄒國英; 劉正耀; 胡彼得; 楊育純; Lin, Chaou-shune; Tsou, Kuo-inn; Liu, Cheng-yao; Woo, Peter; Yang, Yu Chun; |
期刊 | 輔仁醫學期刊 |
出版日期 | 20051200 |
卷期 | 3:4 民94.12 |
頁次 | 頁213-220 |
分類號 | 410.3 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 試題分析; 多項選擇題; 評量; 醫學教育; Item anlaysis; Multiple-choice question; Assessment; Medical education; |
中文摘要 | 背景與目的:筆試的型式會影響學生的學習方式。筆試型式的品質值得課程規劃者及出題老師重視。本研究的目的在調查台灣某一醫學系筆試多項選擇題(Multiple-Choice Questions;MCQ) 試題的品質,及探討試題結構的優劣與鑑別度是否有正相關。方法:以醫學系三、四年級筆試的MCQ 考題為研究樣本。試題品質採用主觀式評量及客觀式評量兩種取向。主觀式評量依Jozefowicz發展的量表由三位專家獨立進行試題結構評分,評估結果以5 等第區分,最低1 分,最高5 分;平均分數大於或等於3 分者,歸類為結構優良試題,3 分以下歸類為結構不良試題。客觀式評量則以試題分析套裝軟體Iteman 為工具,計算題目的難度、鑑別度及試卷的信度。並以student's t test檢定,測試結構優良的試題是否有較高之鑑別度。結果:在484 題MCQ 試題中,試題的結構品質分數平均為2.0±0.8,難度為0.72±0.24,鑑別度為0.2±0.20。結構優良的試題有較高的鑑別度(P<0.05)。結論:醫學系筆試品質仍有改善的空間,未來可加強老師之試題建構技巧以提升試題鑑別度。 |
英文摘要 | Background and Purpose: The purposes of this study were to assess the quality of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) in a medical school, and to investigate whether the high quality of items was positively related to an item discrimination index. Methods: In 2004, 6 examinations from a single Taiwanese medical school were gathered, and each MCQ was evaluated via a subjective and an objective approach. The subjective evaluation was undertaken by 3 independent experts who rated questions on a 5-point scale developed by Jozefowicz. The objective evaluation was carried out based on item difficulty, an item discrimination index, and kappa agreement using the software, Iteman. Results: In total, 484 questions were analyzed. The mean score for the subjective evaluation was 2.0±0.8, and the objective evaluation revealed a mean item difficulty of 0.72±0.24, and a mean item discrimination index of 0.20±0.20. The high subjective evaluation score was positively related to the item discrimination index. Conclusion: According to the results of this study, faculty members should have better training in the skills of writing good multiple-choice questions in order to improve the quality of examinations. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。