查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 東南亞區域整合經驗--「東協模式」的實踐與檢討=Regional Integration of Southeast Asia--ASEAN Way's Practice and Review |
---|---|
作 者 | 郭俊麟; | 書刊名 | 臺灣國際研究季刊 |
卷 期 | 4:1 2008.春[民97.春] |
頁 次 | 頁99-126 |
分類號 | 578.1638 |
關鍵詞 | 區域整合; 區域組織; 東協模式; 不干預原則; 東南亞國協; Regional integration; Regional organization; ASEAN way; Principle of nonintervention; Association of Southeast Asian Nations; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 創立於1967年的東南亞國協,在歷經40年的整合運作,不僅發展成爲亞洲地區重要的區域組織,並在國際舞台上佔有一席之地。東協之所以能夠化解成員國間的分歧,進以促進組織的有效運作,一般將其歸因於「東協模式」-一種強調「非正式」、「包容」、「共識」、「協商」與「不干預內政」等原則的運作模式。然而,「東協模式」在1990年代卻遭遇區域內外的衝擊和挑戰,認爲有重新修正檢討的必要,過去所堅持的原則已無法適應現實複雜多變的環境。回顧東協40年的經營發展,「東協模式」確實有其歷史意義和價值,但「東協模式」是否依然會是未來東南亞共同體的信守規範,並在推動區域一體化中發揮作用則不無疑問,成員國間的政經差距,以及棘手的跨國區域問題,將會是「東協模式」運作的主要考驗,對組織的長遠運作亦造成影響,適當的涉入干預和多數決的引進是東協思索改革的選擇方向。 |
英文摘要 | The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has deftly balanced the interests of its members, anchored regional geopolitical stability, and launched moves toward a free trade area. This success was due to the so-called ”ASEAN way,” a policy of noninterference in member states' internal affairs. Decisions were made by consensus. In recent years, scholars have pointed to situations in which ASEAN has apparently violated the sacred principle of nonintervention, which in turn has led to the questioning of the authenticity of the ”ASEAN way.” The ”ASEAN way” has proved a double-edged sword. It has allowed for a top-level, generalized commonality of purpose in creating a peaceful and prosperous region. At the same time, the ”ASEAN way” has also excused egregious human-rights abuses and hampered effective action in many trans-border issues. This paper discusses the challenge of the ”ASEAN way” and its future development. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。