查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 我國與世界優秀男子桌球選手發球之比較分析=The Compare Analysis of Serves on Elite Man's Table Tennis Game Results in Taiwan |
---|---|
作 者 | 侯淑玲; 陳金海; 鄭炎坤; | 書刊名 | 興國學報 |
卷 期 | 9 2008.01[民97.01] |
頁 次 | 頁195-203 |
分類號 | 528.956 |
關鍵詞 | 桌球; 發球; 優秀選手; Table tennis; Service; Elite athletes; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究目的在比較我國與世界優秀男子桌球選手在發球的差異情形。本研究以參加世界性比賽的我國與世界各國優秀男子選手為研究對象,共計18場比賽36筆資料為研究範圍,以桌球發球記錄表格為研究工具,將所有資料以百分比、卡方檢定進行統計分析。經分析與討論獲得以下結論:一、我國與世界優秀男子桌球選手在發球旋轉達顯著差異,我國優秀選手在發球旋轉主要是以下旋、側下旋與不轉為主,世界優秀選手在發球旋轉主要是以側下旋、不轉與側上旋為主。二、我國與世界優秀男子桌球選手在發球型態達顯著差異,我國優秀桌球選手在發球型態主要是以反手側下旋短球、反手側側下旋短球、正手側下旋短球與反手側步轉短球為主,世界優秀桌球選手在發球型態主要是以反手側側下旋短球、反手側不轉短球、反手側側上旋短球與反手側下旋短球為主。三、我國與世界優秀男子桌球選手在發球距離、發球落點無顯著差異。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study was to compare the relation between serves of the best male table tennis players in Taiwan. We dose research on our top ranking male players and globe elites in the international tournament of table tennis. To amount to 18 table tennis competitions and 36 data in this study, and research by serve record form. All the data used percentage chi-square test. According to the analysis and discuss. The results as follows: 1. There were significant differences in serves spin tactic between our top players and global elite. Our top players in serves spin tactic were backspin, side-and-backspin and no-spin. In another hand, global elites n serves spin tactic were side-and-backspin, no-spin and side-and-topspin. 2. There were significant differences in serves active tactic between out top players and global elite. Our top players in serves active tactic were backhand side-and-backspin short shot, backhand-side side-and-backspin short shot, forehand side-backspin short shot and backhand side-no-spin short shot. In another hand, global elites in serves active tactic were backhand-side side-and-backspin short shot, backhand side-no-spin, backhand-side side-and-topspin short shot and backhand side-and-backspin short shot. 3. There were no differences in serves distance and serves placement. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。