查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 「雅安模式」的發展與侷限:「制度張力」的解釋=The Developments and Limitations of “Ya'An Model”: An Explanation of “the Tension between Institutions” |
---|---|
作 者 | 蔡文軒; | 書刊名 | 遠景基金會季刊 |
卷 期 | 9:1 2008.01[民97.01] |
頁 次 | 頁75-118 |
分類號 | 576.25 |
關鍵詞 | 制度張力; 常委會; 雅安模式; 黨內民主; 黨代會常任制; The tension between institutions; Standing committee; Ya'An model; Intra-party democracy; Permanent system of party representatives; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文從「制度張力」的角度,去解釋中國四川省雅安市推動「黨內民主」的發展與限制。中共的「黨內民主」有兩個原則,分別是「加強黨的領導」及「黨內權力分散」,而這兩個原則的制度需求是互斥的,因此呈現出「制度張力」,從而限制「黨內民主」的發展。我們從雅安市的政治參與、決策分散、權力監督等面向,去分析「制度張力」的困境。而具體的制度,分別為「黨代表直選制」、「黨代會常任制」、「全委會/常委會分工制」、「紀委會受監制」。最後,我們認為「雅安模式」的內在邏輯呈現出「加強黨的領導」及「黨內權力分散」的張力,這反映出列寧式黨國體制的侷限。 |
英文摘要 | The article uses “the tension between institutions” to analyzes the process and limitations of intra-party democracy model now in place in Ya’An City. The two principles of intra-party democracy in the Communist Party of China (CPC) are to enhance CPC leadership and split internal powers. However, these two principles are contradictory in terms of institutional requirements, namely, institutional tension circumscribes internal democracy. The author examines political participation, shared policydecision, and intra-party supervising to see the quagmire of institutional tension. The institutions refer to direct election of party representatives, permanent system of party representatives, division the power among the congress and the standing committees, and supervisions of the discipline inspection committees. The paper concludes that the Ya’ An model reflects the tension of enhancing party leadership and split of internal power, which means the limitations of the Leninist state regime. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。