查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 山楜椒、光葉柃木及錐果櫟樹苗的生長與生理對不同光環境的反應
- 臺灣特有樹種臺灣假黃楊、小芽新木薑子及臺灣梭羅木的生長及光合作用對光量的反應
- Growth and Photosynthetic Responses of Understory Saplings of Three Hardwood Species to Small Patch Thinning in a Cryptomeria japonica Plantation
- 瓶內馴化處理對組織培養苗生長之影響
- 三種臺灣特有種樹苗在不同光環境下的淨光合作用季節變化
- 植物對於低溫逆境之反應及耐受性
- 不同室內光環境對特定景觀植物光合作用速率及生長表現之差別效應
- Immediate Effects of Thinning with a Small Patch Clearcut on Understory Light Environments in a Cryptomeria japonica Plantation in Central Taiwan
- 牛樟扦插苗的生長及光合作用對光量的反應
- 天然闊葉林冠層孔隙內微環境的變化與苗木之生長
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 山楜椒、光葉柃木及錐果櫟樹苗的生長與生理對不同光環境的反應=Growth and Physiological Responses to Light Environment in Seedlings of Litsea Cubeba, Eurya Nitida var. Nitida, and Cyclobalanopsis Longinux |
---|---|
作者 | 林文智; 郭耀綸; Lin, Wen-chin; Kuo, Yau-lun; |
期刊 | 作物、環境與生物資訊 |
出版日期 | 20071200 |
卷期 | 4:4 2007.12[民96.12] |
頁次 | 頁297-306 |
分類號 | 436.27 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 馴化; 生物量分配; 孔隙; 光環境; 光合作用; Acclimation; Biomass allocation; Gap; Light environment; Photosynthesis; |
中文摘要 | 摘要 山胡椒、光葉柃木及錐果櫟是南臺灣多 納地區針闊葉林常見的樹種,此三樹種天然 更新苗出現的光環境並不相同,前二種能在 強光下更新而後者不能。本研究將此三樹種 的盆栽苗分別培育在全光空地、樹冠孔隙(相 對光量15%)、以及森林下方(相對光量3%), 比較其生長與生理對不同光環境的反應。經 過8 個月的試驗,發現隨生長環境可用光量 的增加,山胡椒與光葉柃木的全株生物量會 顯著提高。山胡椒在全光環境下,會將82% 的生物量分配在根部,犧牲莖葉的生長,在 形態方面對高光有很明顯的馴化。然而,山 胡椒在林下環境植株則呈匍伏狀,對低光馴 化不良。錐果櫟在全光環境的生物量顯著低 於孔隙環境,在形態上不能馴化於高光環 境。在光合作用性狀方面,此三樹種苗木的 光補償點、暗呼吸率及光飽和光合作用率 (Asat)均以全光環境最高,林下環境最低。在 全光與孔隙兩環境下,山胡椒的Asat 顯著高 於光葉柃木及錐果櫟,但在林下環境卻以光 葉柃木最高。光葉柃木的生長與生理對高光 與低光都有良好的馴化。錐果櫟生長在全光 環境的植株於2000 μmol m-2 s-1 高光時,光 合作用率會遭光抑制而明顯降低。本研究三 種樹苗的光合作用性狀隨光量改變的樣式都 很類似,但各樹種在形態方面則對光量的反 應樣式很不同,較能顯現各樹種馴化強光或 低光能力的差異。 |
英文摘要 | ABSTRACT Litsea cubeba, Eurya nitida var. nitida, and Cyclobalanopsis longinux are three common tree species of a broadleaf-coniferous forest at Dona in the southern Taiwan. Light environments where natural recruits of these species occurred are different. The first two species can, while the third species can not, regenerate on open fields. In this study, seedlings of these species were grown in an open field, at a canopy gap (15% full light), and in forest understory (3% full light) to reveal their morphological and physiological responses to light environments. After eight months of treatment, biomass of L. cubeba and E. nitida increased significantly as the light availability increased. Litsea cubeba allocated 82% of itsbiomass to root in expense of stem and leaf biomass when grown in the open field, indicating well acclimated to high light. However, it became crawling on the ground when grown in the understory, which showed its poor acclimation to low light. Biomass of C. longinux in the open field was significantly less than those at the canopy gap, and morphologically it did not acclimate to high light. In the aspect of photosynthetic traits, all three species showed the highest light compensation point, dark respiration rate, and light-saturated photosynthetic rate (Asat) in the open field, and the lowest in the understory. In both open and gap environments, L. cubeba had significantly higher Asat than E. nitida and C. longinux. However, in the understory, E. nitida showed the highest Asat. Both morphological and physiological traits of E. nitida acclimated well to either high or low light environments. Photoinhibition occurred in photosynthesis of C. longinux grown in the open field when illuminated with high light of 2000 μmol m-2 s-1. We found that the patterns in the photosynthetic traits response to light environments were very similar for these three species. However, the patterns of their morphological traits response to light environments were very different. Thus, morphological responses could reveal the differences in acclimation ability to light environments for these species. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。