查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Adolescent Self-Identity and Mental Health: The Function of Identity Importance, Identity Firmness, and Identity Discrepancy
- 認同重要性、認同確定性及認同落差概念之生態效度:青少年自我認同個別介入方案之療效評估
- Self-identity and Self-esteem during Different Stages of Adolescence: The Function of Identity Importance and Identity Firmness
- 青少年的身心健康與康樂環境的關係
- 青少年學校相關壓力及身心症狀之研究與應用
- 社會因素對於青少年身心健康的影響
- 青少年的生活壓力,因應行為與其身心健康之相關研究
- 談禁止青少年涉足妨害身心健康場所辦法
- 臺南市高中職生智慧型手機沉迷對運動行為影響之研究
- The Predictability of Identity Importance and Identity Firmness to Depression: Developmental Changes across Adolescence
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Adolescent Self-Identity and Mental Health: The Function of Identity Importance, Identity Firmness, and Identity Discrepancy=青少年自我認同與身心健康:認同重要性、認同確定性、及認同落差之功能 |
---|---|
作者 | 陳坤虎; 雷庚玲; 吳英璋; 姚開屏; Chen, Kun-hu; Lay, Keng-ling; Wu, Yin-chang; Yao, Grace; |
期刊 | 中華心理學刊 |
出版日期 | 20070300 |
卷期 | 49:1 2007.03[民96.03] |
頁次 | 頁53-72 |
分類號 | 173.2 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 認同重要性; 認同確定性; 認同落差; 青少年; 身心健康; Identity importance; Identity firmness; Identity discrepancy; Adolescence; Mental health; |
中文摘要 | Erik Erikson主張「自我認同」為青少年期的主要發展要務,並認為認同概念可解釋心理病理的發展。本研究承襲Erikson之理論,藉「認同重要性」與「認同確定性」的構念探討青少年之心理健康。「認同重要性」由Chen, Lay, and Wu(2005)根據Cheek(1989)對於認同需求的實徵測量方法與對認同面向的區分,而設計出對個人、社會、與形象認同需求之測量。「認同確定性」源自Erikson所強調認同的連續性與同一性,而由Chen et al.(2005)發展個體對於認同同一感之確定程度的測量,亦區分為個人、社會、形象認同三個面向。此外,本研究另提出「認同重要性」與「認同確定性」之落差概念,並主張「認同落差」可預測心理健康。研究一(N=203)採用「已知群體法」,比較「健康控制組」(N=85)與「身心疾病組」(N=56)的大學生在以上三種認同指標上的差異。結果顯示「認同確定性」與「認同落差」的組間差異達到顯著。研究一進一步以迴歸分析檢視「認同落差」的涵意,結果發現雖「認同落差」對於「身心症狀量表」之預測力較「認同重要性」佳,但卻與「認同確定性」無異。此外,認同重要性與身心症狀指標在身心疾病組為正相關,在健康控制組卻為負相關。研究二(N=185)重複檢驗研究一的結果,比較「健康控制組」(N=65)與「神經官能症組」(N=56)的大學生在以上三種認同指標上的差異。結果仍顯示「認同確定性」與「認同落差」的組間差異達到顯著。迴歸分析的結果則發現,「認同落差」對於以SCL-90R為測量工具之十項心理疾病指標之預測力較「認同重要性」為佳且亦幾乎皆較「認同確定性」佳。此外,認同重要性與SCL-90R之GSI指標在神經官能症組為正相關,在健康控制組卻為負相關。整體而言,本研究指出認同確定性與認同落差對身心健康之正、負向預測力,而認同重要性在健康個體與適應不良的個體中,可能分別扮演正面與負面的不同角色。但在認同重要性與確定性同為低分的受試者中,認同落差的作用方式及其與身心健康的關係,則仍需於未來研究中進一步探討。 |
英文摘要 | This study examines how three features of self-identity, namely, identity importance, identity firmness, and identity discrepancy, are related to adolescent mental health. In Study 1 (N=203), college students designated as the healthy-control group (N=85) demonstrated higher identity firmness and lower identity discrepancy than those designated as the psychosomatic group (N=56). Three multiple regression analyses indicated that identity discrepancy was a better predictor of psychosomatic reactions than identity importance, yet its predictability did not differ from identity firmness. Findings of Study 1 were replicated in Study 2 (N=185). Another group of college students designated as the healthy-control group (N=65) demonstrated higher identity firmness and lower identity discrepancy than those designated as the neurosis group (N=56). Study 2 also indicated that identity discrepancy was a better predictor than identity firmness for almost all of the subscales included in the SCL-90R. The present study concluded that the newly developed concept of identity discrepancy" offers a unique view for understanding adolescent mental health, provided that the individual is not at a state of both low identity importance and low identity firmness. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。