查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 電腦輔助教學於國小輕度智能障礙學生錢幣使用技能之影響
- 電腦輔助教學對臺灣國高中輕度智能障礙學生性別平等教育之初探
- 提升電機機械實習實作能力的電腦輔助教學
- 平衡分析之電腦輔助教學研究
- 電腦輔助教學的模組與教學原理研究(以梁剪力與彎矩教學為例)
- A Study Regarding the Effectiveness of Computer Assisted Instruction in Teaching Resume and Cover Letter Writings
- 高級中學高智商低成就學生採用電腦輔助繪圖之成效研究
- 高職部輕度智能障礙學生認知行為取向之人際問題解決訓練成效研究
- 電腦輔助教學應用方式對國小低成就兒童注音符號補救教學成效之探討
- 網路時代英語教師的角色
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 電腦輔助教學於國小輕度智能障礙學生錢幣使用技能之影響=The Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on the Skill of Using Money for Elementary Students with Mild Mental Retardation |
---|---|
作者 | 侯禎塘; 張競文; | 書刊名 | 臺中教育大學學報. 教育類 |
卷期 | 21:2 2007.12[民96.12] |
頁次 | 頁29-53 |
分類號 | 529.62 |
關鍵詞 | 電腦輔助教學; 輕度智能障礙; 錢幣使用技能; Computer-assisted instruction; Mild mental retardation; Using money; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究旨在探討電腦輔助教學在國小輕度智能障礙學生錢幣使用技能訓練之影響。研究對象為兩名國小輕度智能障礙學生,研究設計採單一受試實驗的跨行為多探試設計,自變項為電腦輔助教學之錢幣使用技能訓練,依變項為錢幣使用技能之表現,共進行九週,每週三次之教學活動。本研究以視覺分析法及C統計進行資料分析,以瞭解電腦輔助教學對兩名受試者錢幣使用技能學習之效果。 本研究之結果摘要如下: 一、整體而言,受試甲乙在各單元之錢幣使用技能正確率與基線期相較,平均增進了70%、80.8%、80%,顯示電腦輔助教學對兩位國小輕度智能障礙學生之錢幣使用技能具有良好的立即效果。 二、整體而言,受試甲乙在各單元保留期之錢幣使用技能正確率與處理期相較,增進了13.3%、14.2%、11.3%,顯示電腦輔助教學對兩位國小輕度智能障礙學生之錢幣使用技能具有良好的保留效果。 三、整體而言,受試甲乙在各單元類化期之錢幣使用技能正確率與處理期相較,增進了11.7%、6.2%、2.5%,且皆達本研究預定之評量標準。此外,二位受訪家長亦指出個案目前已有實際購買物品之能力。顯示電腦輔助教學對兩位國小輕度智能障礙學生之錢幣使用技能具有良好的類化效果。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of using CAI to train the skill of using money for two elementary school students with mild mental retardation. The multiple-probe across behavior design was utilized in this study. The independent variable of this study was using computer-assisted instruction to train the skill of using money and the dependent variable was the behavior of the skill of using money. The teaching experiment lasted for consecutive 9 weeks and it was conducted 3 times a week. Visual analysis and the C statistic were used to analyze the effectiveness. Results of this study were summarized as follows: 1. As a whole, compared to the baseline period, the accuracy of using money being taken by students A and B was increased 70%, 80.8% and 80% in treatment period. The results indicated that there were good immediate effects. 2. As a whole, compared to the treatment period, the accuracy of using money being taken by students A and B were increased. 13.3%, 14.2% and 11.3% in maintaining period. The results indicated that there were good long-term effects. 3. As a whole, compared to the treatment period, the accuracy of using money being taken by students A and B were increased 11.7%, 6.2% and 2.5% in generalized period. These results all reached the prediction of this study. Parents also indicated that their children were capable to buy things right now. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。