查詢結果分析
來源資料
第1筆 /總和 1 筆
/ 1 筆
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | The Conundrums of Giorgio Agamben: A Commentary on a Commentary on the Letter to the Romans=阿岡本的難解之謎:對「羅馬書釋義」的釋義 |
---|---|
作者 | 羅嵐.玻爾; Boer, Roland; |
期刊 | 漢語基督教學術論評 |
出版日期 | 20070600 |
卷期 | 3 2007.06[民96.06] |
頁次 | 頁7-36 |
分類號 | 242 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 阿岡本; 保羅; 彌賽亞的; 原初律法; 恩典; Giorgio Agamben; Paul; Messianic; Pre-law; Grace; |
中文摘要 | 在提供對阿岡本《剩餘的時間》的閱讀時,我專注於阿岡本的一連串問題。首先,我感到不解:他為何引用假借保羅為名的書信,以揭露保羅的彌賽亞思想?然後,我批判阿岡本對基督論的聚焦,因為這有許多的問題。再者,我發現「原初律法」的這個觀念所引發的問題,因為這是阿岡本用來理解身為律法思想家的保羅的關鍵。最後,我感到訝異:在阿岡本的詮釋中,恩典究竟發生了什麼事?即使他堅持律法,他還是要一套恩典的理論來克服律法的陷阱。 |
英文摘要 | In offering a reading of Giorgio Agamben's The Time That Remains I focus on a series of problems for Agamben. Firstly, I wonder why he cites the pseudo-Pauline epistles in an effort to uncover Paul's thought on messianism? Further, I criticise Agamben's focus on Christology, since this has a host of problems. Then I find his idea of ”pre-law” problematic, since it is the key, for Agamben, to understanding Paul as a thinker of the Law. Finally, I wonder what has happened to grace in Agamben's interpretation. Despite himself he wants a theory of grace in order to overcome the trap of the Law. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。