查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Effectiveness of Family Care Intervention Program on Activity of Daily Living among Disabled Patients
- 失能患者日常生活活動與其生活滿意度之相關性
- 冰枕與冰毯機對加護病房中顱內損傷發燒病患之降溫效果、舒適情況與影響因素之探討
- 企業教育訓練成效評估模式之實驗研究--以燁隆鋼鐵公司為例
- 臺北縣國小教師對體育教學成效達成覺知之研究
- A study of the Effects of Attitude and Motivation on Military Officers' Achievement in Learning Foreign Languages
- 國際貨幣基金金援成效、衍生問題及其未來動向淺析
- 外人直接投資對臺灣製造業技術引進效果之實證
- Impacts of An Inquiry Teaching Method on Earth Science Students' Learning Outcomes and Attitudes At the Secondary School Level
- 蒙特梭利教學法與單元教學法對幼兒發展影響之比較研究
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Effectiveness of Family Care Intervention Program on Activity of Daily Living among Disabled Patients=家庭照護介入計劃對失能病患日常生活活動之成效 |
---|---|
作 者 | 洪麗珍; 郭憲文; | 書刊名 | The Journal of Nursing Research |
卷 期 | 9:5 2001.12[民90.12] |
頁 次 | 頁191-202 |
分類號 | 429.5 |
關鍵詞 | 成效; 家庭照護介入計劃; 日常生活活動; 失能病患; Effectiveness; Family care intervention program; Activity of daily living; ADL; Disabled patients; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本研究設計為前瞻式研究,其目的在探討家庭照護計劃介入時機的早晚,是否會影響失能病患日常生活活動 (activity of daily living, ADL) 之結果,並探討影響計劃介入後一年存活者ADL 得分之相關因素。研究對象來自衛生所之137位失能病患,其收案條件為巴氏量表 (Barthel index) 總分少於80分、且失能期程二年以內十八歲以上居民。依失能期間之長短分為早期組(失能後六個月以內開始介入) 及晚期組 (失能後7-24個月內開始介入),公衛護士於22週共計八次家訪之計劃期間,除提供相關照護及政策方面之訊息諮詢與醫療轉介外,介入之指導內容著重於照顧者居家照護知能,並記錄病患ADL得分,計劃結束後一年追蹤所有個案之資料及ADL得分。以共變數分析介入對病患ADL之影響,顯示計劃期間早期組ADL得分增加 (12.9) 高於晚期組3.0 (p < .000);一年後存活者之追蹤發現:早期組病患ADL得分增加幅度 (6.2) 仍大於晚期組 (1.3);而影響存活者ADL得分之因素為:年齡、收案時ADL得分及失能期程。研究建議介入計劃若能早期實施,對ADL之改善最具成效。 |
英文摘要 | The objective of this prospective study was to compare the improvement of activity of daily living (ADL) scores between two groups of disabled patients who participated in a family care intervention program. 137 patients were selected from health stations and Activity of Daily Living (ADL) scores were assessed eight times over a period of 22 weeks. Family caregivers were trained to provide home nursing care for the disabled. The patients were divided into two groups: early-stage (intervention started less than 6 months from diagnosis) and late-stage (intervention started 7-24 months from diagnosis). Over the duration of the intervention program, the results, using ANCOVA test, showed that the ADL score of the early-stage had group increased by 12.9, compared to the later-stage group, which increased by 3.0 (p < .000). At one-year follow-up, the ADL score of the early-stage group increased by a greater extent (6.2) than the later-stage group (1.3). The factors that affected ADL scores of the survivals were as follows: age, baseline ADL score and duration of disability. The authors conclude that the intervention program was most effective in improving ADL score when intervention was implemented early. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。