查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Corpus and the Nature of Grammar Revisited
- A Functional Explanation of Taiwan Sign Language Handshape Frequency
- Corpus and Grammar: What It Isn't
- Suggestions for Language Teaching: The Implication of Schema Theory and Psycholinguistic Theory in Communicative Language Teaching
- Bases Filosoficas, Psicologicas y Sociologicas de la Coherencia Linguistica
- From Quantitative to Qualitative Studies: Developments in Chinese Computational and Corpus Linguistics
- Reading in Terms of Psycholinguistics
- 科際整合與整合科技--談計算語言學與語料庫語言學之角色與發展
- 心理語言學的內容及方法:兼論其與語言學之關係
- The Comprehension of Garden Path Sentences: Syntactic Parsing and Thematic Roles
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Corpus and the Nature of Grammar Revisited=再論語料庫及語法的本質 |
---|---|
作者 | 何萬順; 萬依萍; Her, One-soon; Wan, I-ping; |
期刊 | Concentric: Studies in Linguistics |
出版日期 | 20070100 |
卷期 | 33:1 2007.01[民96.01] |
頁次 | 頁67-111 |
分類號 | 801.1 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 衍生語法學; 功能語言學; 語料庫語言學; 心理語言學; Generative grammar; Functional grammar; Psycholinguistics; Corpus linguistics; Innateness; Autonomous syntax; |
中文摘要 | Shei (2004) 最重要的兩項主張是:一、心理語言學與生物學研究 的相關證據顯示衍生語法學是不可信的,二、詞彙的重要性很可能超 過句法;因此語料庫語言學在語法研究上才是較為可行的。本文是對 該文的這些論點一一做出回應。我們首先釐清衍生語法學的部分觀點 及其現況,並且指出該文論證之不足。本文所提出的相對主張是:一、 現有的證據足以顯示衍生語法學是一個值得探索的科學理論,二、衍 生語言學與功能語言學或語料庫語言學並不是必然衝突的;本文最終 的目的在於證明若要瞭解人類的個別語言以及普遍語法,這兩種不同 的理論及其研究方法都是必要的。 |
英文摘要 | This paper is a response to Shei (2004), where the author makes two main claims: (1) the generative grammar is implausible based on evidence from psycholinguistic and biological studies, and (2) lexicon may prove to outweigh syntax and corpus linguistics is thus a more viable alternative. By clarifying some of the generativist views and the current state of affairs and also pointing out some of the inconsistencies in Shei’s arguments, we aim to defend the generative paradigm as a worthy scientific pursuit and, more importantly, also to demonstrate that the generativist approach does not necessarily conflict with the functionalist approach in general or the corpus-based methodologies in particular. We maintain that both approaches may be necessary for a comprehensive view of language and languages. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。