頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 李卓吾的「真道學」--以生命實踐為主體的儒學反思=The True Confucianism for Li Zhuo-wu--An Introspective Reflection on Confucianism about Life Practice |
---|---|
作 者 | 袁光儀; | 書刊名 | 成大宗教與文化學報 |
卷 期 | 8 2007.08[民96.08] |
頁 次 | 頁17-41 |
分類號 | 126.93 |
關鍵詞 | 李贄; 李卓吾; 真道學; 儒學; 聖人之學; 為己之學; Li Zhuo-wu; True confucianism; Confucianism; Sage's wisdom; Authentic being; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 李卓吾是晚明著名的思想家,明清兩代正統道學家強烈批判其「非聖無法」,五十以來學者則大力頌揚他的「非儒反孔」,不論毀譽兩極,皆視其為反傳統的「異端」。本論文則自李卓吾自負「真道學」之本懷,就儒者「生命學問的」角度,重新肯定卓吾學術,確是一套「聖人之學」如何落實於具體生命實踐的思考。而其「異端」之所以為「異」,則在於將儒者「為己之學」推其極,所呈現之「極端個人主義」色彩」。其學術全以個人之生命實踐為主體,故現實生命中所有的才性局限、欲望雜染、生死憂懼等,李卓吾皆能毫不避諱地正視之,甚且肯定之。本有即就「生命的本質:聖凡與才德」、「生命的現實:理欲與義利」、「生命的歸趨:儒釋道一也」三點,分述李卓吾獨特的生命學問,期對其「真道學」之內涵,有更清楚恰當的理解。藉由對李氏學術的反省,對何謂「儒學」,以及儒學未來之發展,亦可有更寬廣多元之思考。 |
英文摘要 | Li Zhuo-wu(李卓吾) was a celebrated thinker of heresy in the Late-Ming Dynasty. He was a controversial figure during his lifetime or after his death. The orthodox neo-Confucian scholars sternly denounced him, but in the May-fourth period, he as considered an iconoclast and the anti-traditionalism. Therefore, the majority scholars neglected that Li Zhuo-wu was educated in traditional Confucian classics and he was a follower of the Wang Yang-ming’s doctrine of the mind. Li Zhuo-wu believed staunchly himself to be a “true Confucian”. However, his learning expressed the liberalism and the individualism, with the result that the majority scholars regarded his “true Confucianism” as a heresy. This text try to be an interpretation for Li Zhuo-wu’s “true Confucianism”. His learning was according to individual life practice. Therefore, the talent and the temperament, the desire and the lust, the worries and ht apprehensions about the reality being, Li Zhuo-wu didn’t evade the issue out of fear to face squarely. The essence of Li Zhuo-wu’s theory displays the spirits of liberties, equality and value diversification. We can say: Li Zhuo-wu’s “true Confucianism” was a distinctive anti-traditionalist, on the contrary, his anti-traditionalism was an interpretation to liberal spirits of Confucianism, and a guideline on liberal treatment of Confucianism. Therefore, his learning was not a heresy, and it could be the edification about the question of t he modern transformation of Confucianism. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。