頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 加拿大大學雙院制治理結構之政策分析=A Policy Analysis on the Bicameral Governing Structure of Canadian Universities |
---|---|
作 者 | 蕭芳華; | 書刊名 | 教育資料集刊 |
卷 期 | 35 2007.09[民96.09] |
頁 次 | 頁167-186 |
分類號 | 525.0953 |
關鍵詞 | 雙院制系統; 治理結構; 治理董事會; 學術評議委員會; Bicameralism; Governance structure; Board of governors; The senate; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 雙院制治理結構所植基的假定是,此模式可以維持政府於大學之外一定的距離,維護學術自主,但實際上政府透過政策機制,仍是有力的主導者。擴大參與的雙院制治理實踐政治的民主理念,但是卻也造成學術評鑑委員會組織過於龐大,而欠缺組織效率和決策理性,說明價值衝突的存在。加拿大大學治理結構變革的演進,分有三階段:第一階段是1900年代決定採行雙院制結構,設置董事會和學術評議委員會。董事會多為政府指派校外人士擔任,強調來自校外的課責,也被稱為外部民主化精神;學術評議委員會多為大學教授和資深行政人員擔任,以確保菁英教育的品質。第二階段是1960年代到1970年代間,維持雙院制並擴大參與的治理,校內不同身分團體都有代表參與治理,被稱為內部民主化運動。第三階段是1980年代以降,大學內部運作上,權力結構實質上已偏向於董事會擁有較多權力,以利其能理性決策和有效率的回應外界變遷的挑戰。加拿大大學雙院制治理實施以來,實務上董事會和學術評議會兩者間的分工合作並未如預期的理想。是否加拿大需要再次進行變革呢?因為修法共識不易達成,程序費時,形式上尚維持的雙院制治理結構,以求穩定性。有了加拿大的前車之鑑,作者建議臺灣政府要思考,同時設置董事會和學術評議委員會的雙院制是否恰當。 |
英文摘要 | The design of Bicamera governing structure is based on the principle of autonomy of university and college. The Senate, a body constituted by representatives of faculty members and students, has full authority on academic life, and as such could prevent any intrusion from any part of the state into the academic activities. This paper attempts to take a critical look into the existence of the Senate, its history, its composition and its impact as well as its problem in the global age. The bicameral structure was adopted in the 1900s as a mean to protect autonomy and to promote excellence. However, in response to the democratization process, in 1960s its structure is enlarged with the participation of the faculty members' and students' representatives. The problem, now, is the Senate is too big to be efficient. And as such, the role of the board of governors becomes more important. Main decision power falls into the hands of the governors. And as a consequence, the co-operation between the strong Board and the weak Senate is not working smoothly. To make their collaboration more effective, a certain law amendment, and a substantial adjustment are needed. Based on the Canadian case, the author proposes the suggestions for the Taiwan government to reconsider the adoption of this policy design. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。