查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 《易傳》與《易緯》的乾坤觀=The Concept of Qian-Kun in Yizhuan and Yiwei |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 許朝陽; | 書刊名 | 輔仁學誌. 人文藝術之部 |
卷期 | 35 2007.06[民96.06] |
頁次 | 頁29-58 |
分類號 | 091 |
關鍵詞 | 易傳; 易緯; 乾鑿度; 乾; 坤; 卦德; 氣化; Yizhuan; Yi-Wei; Qianzaodu; Qian; Kun; Form; Matter; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 《四庫提要.易類》謂「漢儒言象數,去古未遠也。一變而為京、焦,入於禨祥。」「去古未遠」的學說究竟為何,史書無傳,推測可能意指較接近於《易傳》的思想。如果「入於禨祥」意味著「不遵古義」,那麼漢代象數易學的時代風潮可說皆處於「不遵古義」的學風之中,這如何可能?後世以《易傳》為「古義」的觀點,是否在西漢便已成為解《易》的典範?如果不是的話,那麼西漢易學便可以說是處在一種較為開放的詮釋氛圍之中,便沒有所謂「去古已遠」的問題,這便涉及《易傳》地位的考察。 根據史籍所載,除今本《易傳》之外,史上曾出現其他以《易傳》為名的解《易》之作,不過今皆已不存。「差以毫氂,繆以千里」這句話不見於今本《易傳》卻存於《易緯》,曾被以《易》之名引用於《禮記.經解》、《史記.太史公自序》、《漢書.東方朔傳》等史籍中;可見《易傳》在漢初雖有一定的地位,但仍不能據此判定它是絕對的權威,因為《易緯》也獲得類似的肯定。 今本《易傳》之中,《文言》獨出於乾坤二卦,突顯出乾坤二卦的地位性,不同於其餘六十二卦。而乾卦與其傳的編排方式又異於其他眾卦,則又表現了乾卦的獨特處。《易緯》的《乾鑿度》、《乾坤鑿度》亦突顯出對乾坤兩卦的重視。對照《易傳》也有相類的情形,在在顯現乾坤的哲學地位。然二者對乾坤的解釋顯然有極大的差異,一主卦德,一主氣化;透過《易傳》與《易緯》對乾坤二卦詮釋的分析,對漢易典範之移轉當或有更深入之理解。 |
英文摘要 | Explaining the Classics by Zhuan (commentary) is a classic tradition in interpreting Yijing (The Book of Changes). However, the tradition didn't seem to be the mainstream in the Western Han Dynasty. The mainstream of the Yi study in the Western Han Dynasty was conducted by the official learning which was quite alienated from the thinking of Yizhuan. Interpreting the Yijing with the Yiwei was a common situation among the Han Dynasty, and Yiwei even became the interpretative foundation in the East Han Dynasty. In related documents, Yiwei also got a positive academic position as Yizhuan; consequently, an inspection on the academic position is necessary. Qian and Kun are emphasized both in Yizhuan and Yiwei. For example, with only Qian and Kun interpreted in Wenyan, the position of the two hexagrams is quite outstanding during the other sixty-two hexagrams. Besides, with the arrangement of Qian-Zhuan, the uniqueness of Qian also stands out against others. The importance of Qian and Kun are emphasized in Yiwei, too. However, with the comparison of form and matter, the interpretation of Yizhuan and Yiwei are quite different. Through the analysis of the interpretation of Yizhuan and Yiwei, the transformation of the paradigm may be more comprehensible. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。