頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 建築構造類型:一個傳統民居研究方法論的輪廓=Construction Building Type: Outline of Research Methodology on Folk Dwelling |
---|---|
作者 | 楊裕富; | 書刊名 | 空間設計學報 |
卷期 | 2 民95.12 |
頁次 | 頁71-82 |
分類號 | 922.932 |
關鍵詞 | 構造類型; 傳統建築; 研究方法論; Construction building type; Folk dwelling; Methodology; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 民居研究或傳統建築研究其實潛藏著一些意識形態的危機,正是這種意識形態危機造成民居研究或傳統建築研究長期停留在假客觀的技術研究或假客觀的科學研究上,致使研究成果受到侷限,最少在知識形成的過程與結果上受到了侷限。 本論文主要目的有三:其一,透過方法論議題取代研究方法議題,來澄清並避免上述研究的侷限;其二,透過方法論議題的檢證,試圖推論並建構出一種經得起考驗的建築史研究方法;其三,初步整理臺灣傳統建築的構造類型。 本論文透過長期且系列的研究來說明一個簡單的事實:西方建築原型與中國或臺灣建築原型是不同的,所以,西方建築故事與中國建築故事也是不同的。同理,建築史乃至建築的發展與願景當然不同。 |
英文摘要 | There are some ideological cramp on the research of folk dwelling or traditional architecture. Just these ideological cramp make folk dwelling research staying on the condition of so call "pretended scientific research" or "pretended objective research". This paper aim at crashing these ideological cramp, steps by steps as fellow: First: Traditional architecture research just equal to history research or history writing, so, we propose the methodology issue to instead of method issue on folk dwelling research. This step let us to crashing these ideological cramp. Second: as we make sure the methodology issue on folk dwelling research, then, we deduce the research method on folk dwelling research. And by long period field study, we induce a workable research method on folk dwelling research. Third: We call this research method as "construction building type". And by long period field study, we know that prototype of west building is quite different from prototype of Chinese building or Taiwan building, so it is easy to know that the story of west building is quite difference from the Chinese building, and there has no reason to expect the history. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。