查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 國小四年級學生黑白棋力與推理能力、創造力與問題解決能力之相關研究
- 國小「酸鹼」與「氧化還原」教學模組設計及學童科學創造力之實作評量
- 國小學生創造力與問題解決能力的相關變項研究
- 創造性問題解決方案對國小資優班與普通班學生創造性問題解決能力、創造力和問題解決能力之影響
- 國小創造性問題解決化學單元教學與學習材料設計及評估
- KJ法教學策略對國小資優生問題解決與創造思考能力之成效研究
- Intel K-12圖像式思考輔助工具融入教學方案對國小資優生推理能力及創造力之研究
- 主題統整教學對國小學童創造力、問題解決能力及學業成就的影響之研究
- DISCOVER課程對提升國小資優生問題解決能力與創造力之成效
- 網路群體決策支援系統對創造力訓練效果之影響
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 國小四年級學生黑白棋力與推理能力、創造力與問題解決能力之相關研究=A Study of the Relationships among the Scores of Othello Game and Fourth Graders' Reasoning, Creativity and, Problem-solving Ability |
---|---|
作 者 | 黃萬居; 邱文鈞; 江帷銓; | 書刊名 | 科學教育研究與發展季刊 |
卷期 | 47 2007.06[民96.06] |
頁次 | 頁19-46 |
分類號 | 521.422 |
關鍵詞 | 黑白棋; 推理能力; 創造力; 問題解決能力; OTHELLO; Reasoning ability; Creativity; Problem solving ability; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究採量為主,質為輔的方法。量化研究以黑白棋遊戲積分與「瑞文氏非文字智力測驗」(SPM)、「威廉斯創造性思考」及「問題解決測驗」之得分進行Pearson相關考驗;質的研究以「解題過程學習單」、「黑白棋謎題測驗」為工具,分析學生解題路徑;研究對象以方便取樣選取臺北縣某國小四年級一個班級學生32名,以兩兩一組方式進行黑白棋循環賽,每人經31輪共496次比賽,獲得學生之積分。結果發現:(1)遊戲積分與「SPM」相關達顯著(p<.01);與「威廉斯創造性思考」及「問題解決測驗」相關達顯著(p<.001);(2)「棋手解題過程學習單」為工具,高分組在推理能力、創造思考及問題解決能力表現與低分組不同;(3)以「黑白棋謎題測驗」分析學生下棋策略,發現:(a)高分組答題正確率皆高於低分組,策略及攻守觀念較具創意;(b)高分組較重視佔角及有遠見。研究結論(1)由遊戲積分高低與學生圖形推理、創造思考及問題解決能力呈顯著相關,可知遊戲積分與學生高層次思維能力有關;(2)高低分組具不同思考策略,棋手整體思考的差異決定棋局的勝負。(3)黑白棋遊戲與學生創造力及問題解決測驗呈高度相關,可能適合作為訓練學生創造力、問題解決能力的工具。(4)高分組下棋獲勝的秘訣在於重視戰略及戰術的運用。 |
英文摘要 | This research aimed to (1) investigate the relationships among the Othello Contest Scores (OCS) and the fourth-graders' Reasoning Ability (RA), Creativity Ability (CA), and Problem-Solving Ability (PSA); (2) investigate the different thinking strategy between Higher-Scored Group (HSG) and Lower-Scored Group (LSG). The research was designed in both quantitative and qualitative methods. In the quantitative aspect, researcher proceeded the Pearson's product-moment correlation by OCS, Raven's Standard Progressive matrices (SPM), Williams Creative Thinking Abilities measurement (CTAM), and Problem-Solving Measurement (PSM). In the qualitative aspect, researchers used "the test for chess players' PSA" and "the puzzles of Othello" as tools to analyze the differences in the path of problem-solving between the HSG and LSG. Thirty-two subjects were chosen from the elementary school at Taipei county, and each student took 31 contest. The findings summarized as follows: (1) There was significant correlation between OCS and SPM (γ=.532, p<.01), (CTAM) (γ=.678, p<.001) and (PSM) (γ=.684, p<.001); (2) There were differences between the HSG and LSG in the RA, Ca and PSA; (3) The HSG was superior than the LSG in the percentage of the correct answers in the puzzles similar to the aspect of chess strategy, defense and offense opinions of the chess. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。