查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Implications of Great Power Rivalries on Regionalism in East Asia
- 以東協為軸心的東亞經濟整合:從區域主義到全球化?
- 東亞區域主義與區域安全:進程、困難與前景
- 東亞金融風暴對東協組織的影響
- 東亞區域主義與經濟互賴
- The Changing Balance of Power in East Asia: Implications for Regional and International Security
- 海線交通對東亞區域安全之影響
- 東亞區域主義與經濟互賴
- 亞洲金融風暴與東亞經濟安全體系之建立
- 歐盟的亞洲政策與對中共、日韓及東協之關係
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Implications of Great Power Rivalries on Regionalism in East Asia=強權敵對關係對東亞區域主義之影響 |
---|---|
作者 | 周志杰; Chou, Chih-Chieh; |
期刊 | 中山人文社會科學期刊 |
出版日期 | 20070600 |
卷期 | 15:1=32 2007.06[民96.06] |
頁次 | 頁27-69 |
分類號 | 578.193 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 東亞; 區域主義; 敵對關係; 美中日關係; 東南亞國協; 區域安全; East Asia; Regionalism; Rivalry; USA-China-Japan relations; ASEAN; Regional security; |
中文摘要 | 冷戰後東亞區域主教的管展迅速,但其深化程度仍深受區城強權之間敵對關條c遺緒的影響。本文藉分析近來美、中、日三國的互動以及東協的對策,勾勒出政治敵對影響東亞區域主義發展的動因及途徑。首先,美國的單邊主義、中國崛起與日本因「正常化」而漸右傾之外交策略,使原即因意或形態、區域安全觀、相互投射的認知與權力競逐等歧異,而影響三者實實合作以深化區域制度的可能性更低。其次,小國不會因強權間的敵對與競爭而往任一方靠攏,反而促其更重視區域多邊制度及其效用。尤其是東協加三與東亞高峰會進程的發展,強化小國集體合作對大國的主義價能力。第三,小國仍選擇性地在群體合作與個別利益問尋求平衡。故東協的存續I即植基於不強迫其成員在制度化與國家利益之間作選擇。最後,三強權外交戰略操作的方向,將持續影響區域主義的發展,無論導向匯合深化或更加分歧。 |
英文摘要 | The development of regionalism in East Asia has speeded up in post-Cold War era. Nevertheless, it is limited by the legacy of political rivalry among the great regional powers. This paper intends to examine causality between such rivalries and regionalism by focusing on USA-China-Japan interactions and ASEAN's response, in order to explain why and how does rivalries affect the prospects for regionalism. First, the development of effective regional institutionalism is precluded by ideological differences, security tensions, mutual suspicion and geopolitical competition between the three powers. These rivalries have been exacerbated by American unilateralism, China's radical emergence, and Japan's redirection for a more prominent international role. Second, tension and competition between three powers, by contrast, does not mean that the region can be divided into their spheres of influence. Conversely, it has created a resurgence in the efficacy and appeal of regional institutions. As the ASEAN Plus Three and the East Asian Summit processes grow, the ASEAN states' bargaining power in dealing with great powers is greatly enhanced within their collaborative institutions. Intriguingly, third, the ASEAN states may work competitive pressures to their own advantage by overriding their cooperative inclinations. ASEAN has proven to be durable, but never been able to risk pushing its members in choosing between institutional effectiveness and individual state interest. Finally, any further differences in how three great powers conduct their foreign strategies will cause intra- regional cooperation to converge or diverge as time progresses. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。