查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Proclaiming a Protectorate over Uganda: The Liberal Party and Late Victorian Empire, 1892-95
- Imperial Liberalism or Liberal Imperialism: British Policy in Egypt, 1893-94
- Parliament and Empire: British Policy in Egypt, 1882-85
- 「自由派的帝國主義」:英國對埃政策,一八九三至一八九四
- 溫度、水質及酸鹼度對埃及斑蚊與白線斑蚊幼蟲取食及發育之影響
- From Party Spirit to Imperial Thinking: The Gladstone Government and the Execution of the Berlin Treaty, 1880-1881
- 屏東縣琉球鄉登革熱病媒蚊十年監測
- 蓋斑鬥魚防治登革熱病媒埃及斑蚊幼蟲潛力之研究
- 趨勢旋風又登陸--再談波特理論
- Growing-up Grotesque in Katherine Anne Porter's Fiction
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Proclaiming a Protectorate over Uganda: The Liberal Party and Late Victorian Empire, 1892-95=烏干達問題與英國自由派帝國主義的發展,1892~95 |
---|---|
作 者 | 王世宗; | 書刊名 | 臺大歷史學報 |
卷 期 | 39 2007.06[民96.06] |
頁 次 | 頁315-367 |
分類號 | 576.413 |
關鍵詞 | 自由黨; 烏干達; 格蘭斯敦; 羅斯柏理; 埃及; 英屬東非公司; 波特; Liberal Party; Uganda; Gladstone; Rosebery; IBEA; Liberalism; Portal; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本論文探討的主題為英國自由黨對於1892至1895年間有關烏干達保護地設置問題的政策立場,以及由此所反映的自由主義與帝國主義理念之調和與衝突。烏干達問題的出現及難處,在於英國取得當地治權的容易以及經營當地的耗費過鉅,在無嚴重的列強威脅與土著挑戰之下,烏干達問題更能彰顯英國帝國主義的原始性與特殊性,而這個問題對於自由黨的「保守主義化」或「帝國主義化」,也引發根本的反省與巨大的影響。據此,本研究重點包括:一、烏干達在大英帝國的東非擴張計畫中所具有的地位與重要性,以及烏干達問題作為埃及問題延伸的表現;二、烏干達問題爭議所導致的英國自由黨意識形態與政策路線之分裂,此即是有關格蘭斯敦主義(Gladstonianism)與羅斯柏理主義( Roseberianism)的交替問題;三、烏干達問題在十九世紀末期英國政黨政治與列強帝國衝突情勢中,所呈現的特質與所造成的衝擊;四、羅斯柏理執政下,烏干達問題的解決方案及其對於自由主義新取向的影響;五、烏干達問題所表現的「自由派帝國主義」在理念與實踐之間的落差。這個研究探討「新帝國主義」(The New Imperialism, 1871-1914)追求國家榮耀而不計現實經濟利害的精神性意涵,以此顯示一般左派學者討論帝國擴張或殖民主義的「盲點」,並說明近代自由主義因應複雜而密切的人際與國際關係時,所做的調整及其成敗得失。 |
英文摘要 | This research aims to expound the Liberal Party's attitude and policy towards the establishment of the Uganda protectorate in the mid-1890s, thereby revealing the conflict and reconciliation between modem liberalism and imperialism. This study examines five points at issue: 1. Uganda and East Africa in the perspective of British imperial strategy; 2. The Uganda Question as a test of the Liberals' formulae on imperial politics, esp. Gladstonianism and Roseberianism; 3. The Uganda Question in the context of home and international politics; 4. The Uganda business under the Rosebery Government from 1894 to 1895; 5. The solution of the Uganda Question and its impacts upon “Liberal Imperialism” in practice. In general, these issues explain the way - however different from that of the Con-servatives - the Liberals contributed to the expansion of the British Empire. This treatise shows that the annexation of Uganda was a cheap enterprise, and that the “New Imperialism" in the late nineteenth century was to a great extent a byproduct of European power politics based upon a sophisticated nation-state system. More often than not, therefore, prestige mattered more than “material” things in the decision-making of foreign policy, as popular politics was rapidly taking shape in the first Western democracies. A forward policy in Africa might not always be preferable for the Liberals, yet a policy of retreat was never endorsed. So, the controversies over Uganda had, after all, little effect on the advance of the British West African empire. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。