查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Word, Event, and Communion: Trinity in Robert Jenson and Eberhard Jüngel's Thought as Seen in Their Interpretation of Karl Barth
- 前衛運動、現代主義與後現代主義(2)
- <中國當代文學的敘事與性別>[陳順馨著]
- 本是同根生-- 為「十八春」、「半生緣」追本溯源
- 林海音小說中敘事觀點探討
- 遠離非洲,遠離女性:《黑暗之心》中的旅行敘事
- 「虛擬」與「神入」--論羅智成詩中的先秦圖象
- 論民間童話的敘事功能
- 史傳文學中的美學特徵
- First, Second, and Third: An Epistemological Reflection on Comparative Methodology Through Reviewing Tim-hung Ku古添洪,Jihao Shixue記號詩學[Semiotics of Poetry] and Karl H. Kao高辛勇,Xingmingxue Yu Xushi Lilun形名學與敘事理論[Semiotics and Narratology]
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Word, Event, and Communion: Trinity in Robert Jenson and Eberhard Jüngel's Thought as Seen in Their Interpretation of Karl Barth=語言、事件及契合:從詹信與雲格爾對巴特的詮釋看他們的三一論 |
---|---|
作者 | 郭偉聯; Kwok, Wai-luen; |
期刊 | 漢語基督教學術論評 |
出版日期 | 20121200 |
卷期 | 14 2012.12[民101.12] |
頁次 | 頁27-58 |
分類號 | 242.1 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 三一論; 敘事; 信仰的類比; 詹信; 雲格爾; Trinity; Narrative; Analogia fides; Eberhard Jüngel; Robert Jenson; |
中文摘要 | 詹信(Robert Jenson)致力提倡敘事神學式的三一論,並稱它為「修正」的形而上學,但這構想引來學者們質疑他是否妥善處理上帝、時間與受造之間的關係。本文指出詹信問題的核心在於他如何理解敘事的本質。本文透過雲格爾(Eberhard Jüngel)與詹信如何詮釋巴特,指出詹信的問題在於忽視了三一作為上帝自我啟示事件,其中所蘊含溝通言說行動的複雜現象。雲格爾有關三一敘事(作為言說-行動)的解說,提出了其中類比性、溝通性及詮釋性層面的重要性,他的理解能提供解決詹信敘事三一神學問題的一些方向。 |
英文摘要 | Robaert Jenson promotes a narrative theology of the Trinity which he calls ”revisionary” metaphysics. But, it raises concerns about the proper relation between God, time, and creation. The author argues that the problem is in Jenson's understanding of the nature of narrative. A comparison of Eberhard Jüngel and Jenson's theology of the Trinity through their interpretation of Barth finds that Jenson overlooks the communicative complexity of the event of God's self-revelation. Jüngel's understanding of analogical, communicative, and hermeneutical dimensions of the Triune narrative (i.e., as word-event) shows a direction in which we may revise Jenson's theological project. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。