頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 道德或反道德?--李贄及其「童心說」的再詮釋=Moral or Immoral?--Reinterpretation of Li Zhi and His "Tongxin Shuo" |
---|---|
作 者 | 袁光儀; | 書刊名 | 臺北大學中文學報 |
卷 期 | 2 2007.03[民96.03] |
頁 次 | 頁155-185 |
分類號 | 126.93 |
關鍵詞 | 李贄; 李卓吾; 童心說; 真心; 道德; 反道德; Li Zhi; Li Zhuo-wu; Tongxin shuo; True mind; Moral; Immoral; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 李贄是晚明爭議性極大的思想家。歷來皆認定其反傳統、反道學,但晚近學者則已漸能認可其儒學本質,然而對其「童心說」的內涵,依然眾說紛紜。故本論文重新考察之,先由其「童心者,真心也」之「真」,分析其包涵「生命本懷」、「生命實況」與「最高價值」三層次;其次探討李執獨特的「理欲觀」與義利觀」;由此進一步申論「童心」與「道德」之辯證關係。要言之,李贄之童心,為一「存人欲之天理」,然究其「天理」之實,則為一以「真」為唯一最高價值之精神,故著重破除對外律盲從,若以其為「反道德」實屬誤解。 |
英文摘要 | Li Zhi was a celebrated thinker of heresy in the Late-Ming Dynasty. He was a controversial figure during his lifetime or after his death. The orthodox neo-Confucian scholars sternly denounced him, but in the May-Fourth Period time, he was considered an iconoclast and an anti-traditionalism. Therefore, the majority scholars neglected: Li Zhi was educated in traditional Confucian classics and he claimed himself to be a “true Confucian”. Li Zhi’s “Tongixn shuo” that was the core concepts of hs learning should be regarded the succession and development from the Wang Yang-ming’s philosophy of the mind, but many scholars presupposed his “Tongxin Shuo” to be the desire-emancipation theory. This study re-observes Li Zhi and this “Tongxin Shuo” and re-examines its meaning. Then we try to explain: His anti-traditionalism was an introduction to liberal treatment of Confucianism. On the other hand, he advocated “true mind” that cannot be considered the desire-emancipation theory. On the contrary, it was a thinking about morality of autonomy. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。