查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 「隔」與「不隔」--《漢語語言學》書評
- 「教育部對外華語教學能力認證考試」準備策略--以「漢語語言學」為例
- 2008年對外華語教學能力認證考試之漢語語言學考題分析
- 2006~2008 年教育部對外華語教學能力認證考試「漢語語言學」試題內容解析
- 論近代音研究的方法、現況與展望
- 海峽兩岸的華語教學與語言學研究--訪問大陸歸來有感
- 漢語語言學之父--趙元任先生
- 漢語語言學音韻詞之英譯問題
- On Acquisition of Verb-Object Construction in Second Language Chinese Learners of English
- 原型範疇理論及語義場理論於對外華語教學之啟示與應用
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 「隔」與「不隔」--《漢語語言學》書評=Book Review: Research Methods in Teaching Chinese as a Second Language and Academic Writing |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳菘霖; | 書刊名 | 華語文教學研究 |
卷 期 | 11:4 2014.12[民103.12] |
頁 次 | 頁141-146 |
分類號 | 802.033 |
關鍵詞 | 漢語語言學; 語言學; 華語教學; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 華語文寫作測驗近年來成爲主要大型華語文能力測驗項目之一,其重要性日鉅。本研究以美國外語教學委員會(American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages,簡稱ACTFL)所制定之語言分級能力標準為框架,制定出華語文寫作評分規準,並進一步以實證研究來探討ACTFL評分規準所遇到的問題。研究語料為國立臺灣師範大學國語教學中心華語文學習者所寫之同題目作文402篇,專業評分者受培訓後根據ACTFL評分規準評分,研究一方面能為瞭解ACTFL華語文寫作測驗的信度之實徵研究,將評分結果透過百分比一致性與類推性理論分析,檢測測驗之信度。另一方面分析ACTFL之評分架構,就評分規準在分數等級上、計分方式上、分向構面上之三主要研究議題來進行深究與探討,將對寫作測驗有實徵之回饋。 |
英文摘要 | he demand for reliable and valid writing assessing methods of Chinese as a foreign language has grown significantly in recent years. This article reports the construction and the subsequent evaluation of the analytic rating scale based on ACTFL (American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages) writing proficiency guidelines. A corpus of 402 writing scripts from different levels at the Mandarin Training Center at National Taiwan Normal University, but all in response to the same writing task, was collected and graded by five professional raters. Each writing test is independently rated by two raters. The validity of the scale is rigidly controlled throughout the construction and raters training process. The grading results provide qualitative analysis of two main points. On the one hand, the reliability of the assessment is examined in terms of the percentage of agreement between raters as well as generalizability and decision studies. On the other, a number of major issues involved in the development of a rating scale are explored for the purpose of this paper, especially on the examination of analytic rating scale against holistic rating scale, as well as the exploration of rating criteria. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。